Falken FK451 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Falken FK451 vs Michelin Primacy MXM4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 10 + 10 owner reviews. How we score

FK451 is ahead, 68–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken FK451
Tire AFalken

FK451

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 10 reviews

Michelin Primacy MXM4
Tire BMichelin

Primacy MXM4

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests 72 · 1 test Owners 54 · 10 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Primacy MXM4 +6
    73
    Why this score
    SourceFK451Primacy MXM4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)87
    Reviews found online6651

    FK451: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67

    Primacy MXM4: 60% × 87.1 + 40% × 51.1 = 73

    No road tests of dry for FK451. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    FK451 +14
    57
    Why this score
    SourceFK451Primacy MXM4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 71 (est.)57
    Reviews found online7157

    FK451: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 71.2 = 71

    Primacy MXM4: 60% × 56.7 + 40% × 57 = 57

    No road tests of wet for FK451. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    57
    Why this score
    SourceFK451Primacy MXM4
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online–47

    Primacy MXM4: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 57

    No road tests of snow for Primacy MXM4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    FK451 +13
    54
    Why this score
    SourceFK451Primacy MXM4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 68 (est.)63
    Reviews found online6747

    FK451: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 66.6 = 67

    Primacy MXM4: 40% × 63.4 + 60% × 47.3 = 54

    No road tests of comfort for FK451. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    75
    Why this score
    SourceFK451Primacy MXM4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–81
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    Primacy MXM4: 60% × 80.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 75

    No owner ratings of noise for Primacy MXM4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    FK451 +6
    62
    Why this score
    SourceFK451Primacy MXM4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6959

    FK451: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 68

    Primacy MXM4: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 59.2 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for FK451. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Primacy MXM4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    FK451 +17
    49
    Why this score
    SourceFK451Primacy MXM4
    Reviews found online6649
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    55
    Why this score
    SourceFK451Primacy MXM4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–55
Scores at a glance
Falken FK451 vs Michelin Primacy MXM4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken FK451Michelin Primacy MXM4
Relative Score 68 62
Dry 67 73
Wet 71 57
Snow – 57
Comfort 67 54
Noise – 75
Treadwear 68 62
Handling (owners) 66 49
Efficiency – 55

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

FK451

± 8

Primacy MXM4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A FK451

Pros

  • Exceptional price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong wet and dry traction
  • Excellent tread life and durability

Cons

  • Potential for rubber cracking between treads over long-term storage or extended age
  • Some users report a slightly less 'alive' or communicative steering feel compared to premium performance tires
  • Availability concerns as it is an older model often superseded by newer iterations
All owner themes in the FK451 review

Tire B Primacy MXM4

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and vibration dampening
  • Strong tread life and durability
  • High fuel efficiency

Cons

  • Mediocre dry grip and handling precision
  • Noticeable understeer when cornering
  • Soft sidewalls that lack steering feedback
All owner themes in the Primacy MXM4 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken FK451 B · Michelin Primacy MXM4
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
UTQG280 AA A420 - 500 AA - B A

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken FK451

Michelin Primacy MXM4

Winner: Falken FK451 — better handling, wet and comfort. Pick the Michelin Primacy MXM4 if dry matters most to you. Falken FK451 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Primacy MXM4 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken FK451 scores 66 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken FK451 scores 71 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Falken FK451 scores 67 vs 54 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken FK451 scores 68 vs 62 on treadwear.

Tire A · Falken FK451
Tire B · Michelin Primacy MXM4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

FK451 or Primacy MXM4?

Which is better in the wet, FK451 or Primacy MXM4?

Falken FK451, 71 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, FK451 or Primacy MXM4?

Michelin Primacy MXM4, 73 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, FK451 or Primacy MXM4?

Falken FK451, 67 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, FK451 or Primacy MXM4?

Falken FK451, 68 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology