Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 10 reviews
Falken FK451 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Falken FK451 vs Michelin Primacy MXM4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 10 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
FK451 leads, 68–64 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 1 test Owners 57 · 10 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Primacy MXM4 +975Why this score
Source FK451 Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 87 Reviews found online 65 57 FK451: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66
Primacy MXM4: 60% × 86.7 + 40% × 56.7 = 75
No road tests of dry for FK451. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
70
Wet
FK451 +1258Why this score
Source FK451 Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 56 Reviews found online 70 61 FK451: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 70
Primacy MXM4: 60% × 56.1 + 40% × 61.1 = 58
No road tests of wet for FK451. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison56Why this score
Source FK451 Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online – 47 Primacy MXM4: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 47 = 56
No road tests of snow for Primacy MXM4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
68
Comfort
FK451 +860Why this score
Source FK451 Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 64 Reviews found online 67 53 FK451: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 68
Primacy MXM4: 60% × 63.9 + 40% × 53.1 = 60
No road tests of comfort for FK451. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison73Why this score
Source FK451 Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 82 Reviews found online – 60 Primacy MXM4: 60% × 81.5 + 40% × 59.6 = 73
-
67
Treadwear
FK451 +463Why this score
Source FK451 Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 68 61 FK451: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.5 = 67
Primacy MXM4: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for FK451. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Primacy MXM4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
65
Handling (owners)
FK451 +1154Why this score
Source FK451 Primacy MXM4 Reviews found online 65 54
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken FK451 | Michelin Primacy MXM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 64 |
| Dry | 66 | 75 |
| Wet | 70 | 58 |
| Snow | – | 56 |
| Comfort | 68 | 60 |
| Noise | – | 73 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 54 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
FK451
Primacy MXM4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A FK451
Pros
- Exceptional price-to-performance ratio
- Strong wet and dry traction
- Excellent tread life and durability
Cons
- Potential for rubber cracking between treads over long-term storage or extended age
- Some users report a slightly less 'alive' or communicative steering feel compared to premium performance tires
- Availability concerns as it is an older model often superseded by newer iterations
Tire B Primacy MXM4
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and vibration dampening
- Strong tread life and durability
- High fuel efficiency
Cons
- Mediocre dry grip and handling precision
- Noticeable understeer when cornering
- Soft sidewalls that lack steering feedback
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken FK451 | B · Michelin Primacy MXM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken FK451
Michelin Primacy MXM4
Narrow edge: Falken FK451 — better wet, handling and comfort. Pick the Michelin Primacy MXM4 if dry matters most to you. Falken FK451 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Primacy MXM4 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Falken FK451 scores 70 vs 58 on wet.
Falken FK451 scores 65 vs 54 on handling.
Michelin Primacy MXM4 scores 75 vs 66 on dry.
Falken FK451 scores 68 vs 60 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
FK451 or Primacy MXM4?
Which is better in the wet, FK451 or Primacy MXM4?
Falken FK451, 70 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, FK451 or Primacy MXM4?
Michelin Primacy MXM4, 75 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, FK451 or Primacy MXM4?
Falken FK451, 68 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, FK451 or Primacy MXM4?
Falken FK451, 67 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology