Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 10 reviews
Falken FK451 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Pirelli Scorpion A/T looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Falken FK451 vs Pirelli Scorpion A/T — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 4 owner reviews. How we score
FK451 leads, 68–65 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 61 · 4 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Level66Why this score
Source FK451 Scorpion A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 65 64 FK451: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66
Scorpion A/T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 66
No road tests of dry for FK451. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Scorpion A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
70
Wet
FK451 +466Why this score
Source FK451 Scorpion A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 70 65 FK451: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 70
Scorpion A/T: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 65.2 = 66
No road tests of wet for FK451. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Scorpion A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison53Why this score
Source FK451 Scorpion A/T Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online – 42 Scorpion A/T: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 42.3 = 53
No road tests of snow for Scorpion A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
68
Comfort
FK451 +266Why this score
Source FK451 Scorpion A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 67 63 FK451: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 68
Scorpion A/T: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 66
No road tests of comfort for FK451 or Scorpion A/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
FK451 +463Why this score
Source FK451 Scorpion A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 68 62 FK451: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.5 = 67
Scorpion A/T: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.9 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for FK451. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Scorpion A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
65
Handling (owners)
Scorpion A/T +166Why this score
Source FK451 Scorpion A/T Reviews found online 65 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken FK451 | Pirelli Scorpion A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 65 |
| Dry | 66 | 66 |
| Wet | 70 | 66 |
| Snow | – | 53 |
| Comfort | 68 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
FK451
Scorpion A/T
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A FK451
Pros
- Exceptional price-to-performance ratio
- Strong wet and dry traction
- Excellent tread life and durability
Cons
- Potential for rubber cracking between treads over long-term storage or extended age
- Some users report a slightly less 'alive' or communicative steering feel compared to premium performance tires
- Availability concerns as it is an older model often superseded by newer iterations
Tire B Scorpion A/T
Pros
- Excellent wet-weather traction and cornering stability
- Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and noise levels
- Strong off-road capability
Cons
- Reports of premature dry rotting in certain climates
- Inconsistent longevity across different usage scenarios
- Occasional reports of increased road noise
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken FK451 | B · Pirelli Scorpion A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken FK451
Pirelli Scorpion A/T
Narrow edge: Falken FK451 — better wet and treadwear. Where the Pirelli Scorpion A/T is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Falken FK451 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Pirelli Scorpion A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Falken FK451 scores 70 vs 66 on wet.
Falken FK451 scores 67 vs 63 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
FK451 or Scorpion A/T?
Which is better in the wet, FK451 or Scorpion A/T?
Falken FK451, 70 vs 66 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, FK451 or Scorpion A/T?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, FK451 or Scorpion A/T?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, FK451 or Scorpion A/T?
Falken FK451, 67 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology