Falken FK451 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Falken FK451 vs Sumitomo HTR Z III — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 10 + 42 owner reviews. How we score

FK451 leads, 68–66 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken FK451
Tire AFalken

FK451

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 10 reviews

Sumitomo HTR Z III
Tire BSumitomo

HTR Z III

Summer

Tests – · 1 test Owners 57 · 42 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    HTR Z III +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceFK451HTR Z III
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6568

    FK451: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66

    HTR Z III: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 68

    No road tests of dry for FK451. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for HTR Z III. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 70

    Wet

    FK451 +6
    64
    Why this score
    SourceFK451HTR Z III
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7062

    FK451: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 70

    HTR Z III: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 64

    No road tests of wet for FK451. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for HTR Z III. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    35
    Why this score
    SourceFK451HTR Z III
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 51 (est.)
    Reviews found online–12

    HTR Z III: 60% × 50.8 (est.) + 40% × 12.2 = 35

    No road tests of snow for HTR Z III. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    FK451 +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceFK451HTR Z III
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6765

    FK451: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 68

    HTR Z III: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for FK451 or HTR Z III. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    66
    Why this score
    SourceFK451HTR Z III
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–65

    HTR Z III: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 66

    No road tests of noise for HTR Z III. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    FK451 +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceFK451HTR Z III
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)70
    Reviews found online6860

    FK451: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.5 = 67

    HTR Z III: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 59.9 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for FK451. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 65

    Handling (owners)

    HTR Z III +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceFK451HTR Z III
    Reviews found online6567
Scores at a glance
Falken FK451 vs Sumitomo HTR Z III: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken FK451Sumitomo HTR Z III
Relative Score 68 66
Dry 66 68
Wet 70 64
Snow – 35
Comfort 68 67
Noise – 66
Treadwear 67 66
Handling (owners) 65 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

FK451

HTR Z III

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A FK451

Pros

  • Exceptional price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong wet and dry traction
  • Excellent tread life and durability

Cons

  • Potential for rubber cracking between treads over long-term storage or extended age
  • Some users report a slightly less 'alive' or communicative steering feel compared to premium performance tires
  • Availability concerns as it is an older model often superseded by newer iterations
All owner themes in the FK451 review

Tire B HTR Z III

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong dry handling and steering feedback
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet-weather side grip during cornering
  • Limited traction under heavy acceleration on high-horsepower vehicles
  • Not suitable for winter or freezing conditions
All owner themes in the HTR Z III review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken FK451 B · Sumitomo HTR Z III
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken FK451

Sumitomo HTR Z III

Narrow edge: Falken FK451 — better wet. Where the Sumitomo HTR Z III is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Falken FK451 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken FK451 scores 70 vs 64 on wet.

Tire A · Falken FK451
Tire B · Sumitomo HTR Z III

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

FK451 or HTR Z III?

Which is better in the wet, FK451 or HTR Z III?

Falken FK451, 70 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, FK451 or HTR Z III?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 68 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, FK451 or HTR Z III?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 67 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, FK451 or HTR Z III?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology