Head-to-head Updated

Falken ZIEX CT50 vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 3 + 15 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZIEX CT50
Tire AFalken

ZIEX CT50

Summer Premium Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners – · 3 reviews (needs 5)

Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Tire BYokohama

Advan Sport AS

All-Season tire

± 8

Tests 61 · 2 tests Owners 60 · 15 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    50
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX CT50Advan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–42
    Reviews found online–61

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 42.3 + 40% × 60.5 = 50

  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    60
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX CT50Advan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–57
    Reviews found online–65

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 57 + 40% × 64.5 = 60

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    56
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX CT50Advan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online–48

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 56

    No road tests of snow for Advan Sport AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    64
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX CT50Advan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–62
    Reviews found online–65

    Advan Sport AS: 40% × 62.4 + 60% × 64.7 = 64

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX CT50Advan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–73
    Reviews found online–64

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 63.6 = 69

  6. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX CT50Advan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–81
    Reviews found online–60

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 81 + 40% × 59.7 = 72

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    63
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX CT50Advan Sport AS
    Reviews found online–63
Scores at a glance
Falken ZIEX CT50 vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken ZIEX CT50Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Relative Score – 60
Dry – 50
Wet – 60
Snow – 56
Comfort – 64
Noise – 69
Treadwear – 72
Handling (owners) – 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ZIEX CT50

± 8

Advan Sport AS

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ZIEX CT50

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Advan Sport AS

Pros

  • Quiet and comfortable highway ride
  • Good overall traction in wet and dry conditions
  • Excellent value for the money compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Potential road force balancing issues reported by some users
  • Some enthusiasts feel ultimate performance capability is lacking
  • Tread life remains largely unproven in early-mileage reviews
All owner themes in the Advan Sport AS review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZIEX CT50 B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—11/32″
UTQG—440 A A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken ZIEX CT50

Yokohama Advan Sport AS

Only Yokohama Advan Sport AS has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Falken ZIEX CT50
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology