Tests – · none yet Owners – · 3 reviews (needs 5)
Falken ZIEX CT50 vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 3 + 15 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 61 · 2 tests Owners 60 · 15 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison50Why this score
Source ZIEX CT50 Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 42 Reviews found online – 61 Advan Sport AS: 60% × 42.3 + 40% × 60.5 = 50
-
–
Wet
No comparison60Why this score
Source ZIEX CT50 Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 57 Reviews found online – 65 Advan Sport AS: 60% × 57 + 40% × 64.5 = 60
-
–
Snow
No comparison56Why this score
Source ZIEX CT50 Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online – 48 Advan Sport AS: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 56
No road tests of snow for Advan Sport AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
–
Comfort
No comparison64Why this score
Source ZIEX CT50 Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 62 Reviews found online – 65 Advan Sport AS: 40% × 62.4 + 60% × 64.7 = 64
-
–
Noise
No comparison69Why this score
Source ZIEX CT50 Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 73 Reviews found online – 64 Advan Sport AS: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 63.6 = 69
-
–
Treadwear
No comparison72Why this score
Source ZIEX CT50 Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 81 Reviews found online – 60 Advan Sport AS: 60% × 81 + 40% × 59.7 = 72
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison63Why this score
Source ZIEX CT50 Advan Sport AS Reviews found online – 63
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken ZIEX CT50 | Yokohama Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 60 |
| Dry | – | 50 |
| Wet | – | 60 |
| Snow | – | 56 |
| Comfort | – | 64 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | – | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ZIEX CT50
Advan Sport AS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ZIEX CT50
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Advan Sport AS
Pros
- Quiet and comfortable highway ride
- Good overall traction in wet and dry conditions
- Excellent value for the money compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Potential road force balancing issues reported by some users
- Some enthusiasts feel ultimate performance capability is lacking
- Tread life remains largely unproven in early-mileage reviews
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken ZIEX CT50 | B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 440 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken ZIEX CT50
Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Only Yokohama Advan Sport AS has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology