Head-to-head Updated

Federal 595 RS-Pro vs Nankang NS2R — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 21 + 68 owner reviews. How we score

NS2R is ahead, 65–58

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Federal 595 RS-Pro
Tire AFederal

595 RS-Pro

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 21 reviews

Nankang NS2R
Tire BNankang

NS2R

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 68 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    NS2R +4
    70
    Why this score
    Source595 RS-ProNS2R
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6572

    595 RS-Pro: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66

    NS2R: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 70

    No road tests of dry for 595 RS-Pro. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for NS2R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 55

    Wet

    NS2R +9
    64
    Why this score
    Source595 RS-ProNS2R
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4962

    595 RS-Pro: 60% × 58.7 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 55

    NS2R: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.7 = 64

    No road tests of wet for 595 RS-Pro. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for NS2R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 42

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    Source595 RS-ProNS2R
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)–
    Reviews found online22–

    595 RS-Pro: 60% × 55.1 (est.) + 40% × 22.1 = 42

    No road tests of snow for 595 RS-Pro. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 52

    Comfort

    NS2R +2
    54
    Why this score
    Source595 RS-ProNS2R
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online4447

    595 RS-Pro: 40% × 63.6 (est.) + 60% × 43.5 = 52

    NS2R: 40% × 64.3 (est.) + 60% × 47.1 = 54

    No road tests of comfort for 595 RS-Pro. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for NS2R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 59

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    Source595 RS-ProNS2R
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online47–

    595 RS-Pro: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 47.2 = 59

    No road tests of noise for 595 RS-Pro. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 51

    Treadwear

    NS2R +11
    62
    Why this score
    Source595 RS-ProNS2R
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online4260

    595 RS-Pro: 60% × 57.6 (est.) + 40% × 41.8 = 51

    NS2R: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for 595 RS-Pro. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for NS2R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 64

    Handling (owners)

    NS2R +9
    73
    Why this score
    Source595 RS-ProNS2R
    Reviews found online6473
Scores at a glance
Federal 595 RS-Pro vs Nankang NS2R: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFederal 595 RS-ProNankang NS2R
Relative Score 58 65
Dry 66 70
Wet 55 64
Snow 42 –
Comfort 52 54
Noise 59 –
Treadwear 51 62
Handling (owners) 64 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

595 RS-Pro

± 8

NS2R

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A 595 RS-Pro

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and traction once warmed up
  • Great value and cost-effectiveness for track and spirited driving
  • Quieter road noise compared to aggressive predecessors like the RS-RR

Cons

  • Requires time to reach optimal operating temperatures for full grip
  • Limited confidence and performance in wet conditions
  • Softer sidewall can reduce initial steering sharpness during quick transitions
All owner themes in the 595 RS-Pro review

Tire B NS2R

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and handling performance for the price
  • Stiff sidewall construction providing precise steering feedback
  • High durability and tread life compared to other track-focused tires

Cons

  • Excessive road noise often mistaken for failing wheel bearings
  • Poor wet weather performance and high risk of hydroplaning
  • Requires significant heat to achieve maximum grip
All owner themes in the NS2R review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Federal 595 RS-Pro B · Nankang NS2R
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4—
Rim diameters15″ – 19″—
Tread depth7/32″—
UTQG200 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Federal 595 RS-Pro

Nankang NS2R

Winner: Nankang NS2R — better treadwear, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nankang NS2R scores 62 vs 51 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nankang NS2R scores 64 vs 55 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nankang NS2R scores 73 vs 64 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Nankang NS2R scores 70 vs 66 on dry.

Tire A · Federal 595 RS-Pro
Tire B · Nankang NS2R

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

595 RS-Pro or NS2R?

Which is better in the wet, 595 RS-Pro or NS2R?

Nankang NS2R, 64 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, 595 RS-Pro or NS2R?

Nankang NS2R, 70 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, 595 RS-Pro or NS2R?

Neither, by our numbers: 52 vs 54 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, 595 RS-Pro or NS2R?

Nankang NS2R, 62 vs 51 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology