Nexen N FERA SUR4 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Destination A/T vs Nexen N FERA SUR4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 80 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

Destination A/T is ahead, 68–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Destination A/T
Tire AFirestone

Destination A/T

All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 80 reviews

Nexen N FERA SUR4
Tire BNexen

N FERA SUR4

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    N FERA SUR4 +4
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDestination A/TN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6773

    Destination A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 67

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 71

    No road tests of dry for Destination A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 70

    Wet

    Destination A/T +15
    55
    Why this score
    SourceDestination A/TN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online7050

    Destination A/T: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 70

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 55

    No road tests of wet for Destination A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 69

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDestination A/TN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)–
    Reviews found online68–

    Destination A/T: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 69

    No road tests of snow for Destination A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    Destination A/T +8
    60
    Why this score
    SourceDestination A/TN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6751

    Destination A/T: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 68

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for Destination A/T or N FERA SUR4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 69

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDestination A/TN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online71–

    Destination A/T: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Destination A/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Destination A/T +12
    55
    Why this score
    SourceDestination A/TN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6847

    Destination A/T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 67

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 46.7 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for Destination A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 65

    Handling (owners)

    N FERA SUR4 +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDestination A/TN FERA SUR4
    Reviews found online6571
Scores at a glance
Firestone Destination A/T vs Nexen N FERA SUR4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone Destination A/TNexen N FERA SUR4
Relative Score 68 62
Dry 67 71
Wet 70 55
Snow 69 –
Comfort 68 60
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 67 55
Handling (owners) 65 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Destination A/T

N FERA SUR4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Destination A/T

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and low road noise for an all-terrain tire
  • Strong value proposition with competitive pricing
  • Reliable traction in diverse conditions including snow, sand, and wet pavement

Cons

  • Noticeable decline in wet-weather traction as tread depth wears down
  • Tendency to hydroplane in deep standing water
  • Limited performance in deep, thick mud compared to more aggressive mud-terrain tires
All owner themes in the Destination A/T review

Tire B N FERA SUR4

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
  • Precise steering feedback and predictable handling
  • Cost-effective alternative to more expensive track tires

Cons

  • High level of road noise
  • Poor wet-weather performance and dangerous hydroplaning tendencies in heavy rain
  • Fast tread wear
All owner themes in the N FERA SUR4 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Destination A/T B · Nexen N FERA SUR4
CategoryAll Season All Terrain and Off Road tiresSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth14/32″—
UTQG460 A B—
SidewallOutlined White Lettering—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Destination A/T

Nexen N FERA SUR4

Winner: Firestone Destination A/T — better wet, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Nexen N FERA SUR4 if handling and dry matter most to you. Nexen N FERA SUR4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Firestone Destination A/T scores 70 vs 55 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Firestone Destination A/T scores 67 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Firestone Destination A/T scores 68 vs 60 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N FERA SUR4 scores 71 vs 65 on handling.

Tire A · Firestone Destination A/T
Tire B · Nexen N FERA SUR4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Destination A/T or N FERA SUR4?

Which is better in the wet, Destination A/T or N FERA SUR4?

Firestone Destination A/T, 70 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Destination A/T or N FERA SUR4?

Nexen N FERA SUR4, 71 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Destination A/T or N FERA SUR4?

Firestone Destination A/T, 68 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Destination A/T or N FERA SUR4?

Firestone Destination A/T, 67 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology