Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Destination LE2 vs Firestone Firehawk AS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 102 + 8 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Destination LE2 68, Firehawk AS 69.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Firehawk AS
Tire BFirestone

Firehawk AS

All Season High Performance tires

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 8 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Firehawk AS +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDestination LE2Firehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6771

    Destination LE2: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 67

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 70

    No road tests of dry for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 70

    Wet

    Destination LE2 +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDestination LE2Firehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6969

    Destination LE2: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 70

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 66

    Snow

    Level
    66
    Why this score
    SourceDestination LE2Firehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6463

    Destination LE2: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 66

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    Firehawk AS +5
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDestination LE2Firehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6270

    Destination LE2: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 61.5 = 64

    Firehawk AS: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 69.5 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Destination LE2 or Firehawk AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 69

    Noise

    Firehawk AS +1
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDestination LE2Firehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7274

    Destination LE2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 69

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Destination LE2 or Firehawk AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    Firehawk AS +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDestination LE2Firehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6972

    Destination LE2: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    Level
    67
    Why this score
    SourceDestination LE2Firehawk AS
    Reviews found online6767
Scores at a glance
Firestone Destination LE2 vs Firestone Firehawk AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone Destination LE2Firestone Firehawk AS
Relative Score 68 69
Dry 67 70
Wet 70 69
Snow 66 66
Comfort 64 69
Noise 69 70
Treadwear 68 70
Handling (owners) 67 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Destination LE2

± 8

Firehawk AS

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Destination LE2

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet traction
  • Affordable, high-value pricing
  • Quiet and comfortable highway ride

Cons

  • Tendency to pick up and retain small stones from gravel roads
  • Occasional reports of higher-than-expected road noise on specific vehicle models
  • Isolated instances of balancing difficulties or premature wear
All owner themes in the Destination LE2 review

Tire B Firehawk AS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Strong dry handling and improved cornering response
  • Good water dispersion and wet road performance for most users

Cons

  • Potential susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain according to select reviewers
  • Requires proper balancing to prevent irregular tread wear
All owner themes in the Firehawk AS review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Destination LE2 B · Firestone Firehawk AS
CategoryAll-Season tireAll Season High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available54
Rim diameters16″ – 18″15″ – 18″
Tread depth11/32″11/32″
UTQG520 A B480 A A
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi50,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi44 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Destination LE2

Firestone Firehawk AS

Too close to call: Firestone Destination LE2 and Firestone Firehawk AS are within 2 points overall. Firestone Firehawk AS is stronger on comfort and dry. Firestone Firehawk AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 69 vs 64 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 70 vs 67 on dry.

Tire A · Firestone Destination LE2
Tire B · Firestone Firehawk AS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Destination LE2 or Firehawk AS?

Which is better in the wet, Destination LE2 or Firehawk AS?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Destination LE2 or Firehawk AS?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 70 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Destination LE2 or Firehawk AS?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Destination LE2 or Firehawk AS?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Destination LE2 or Firehawk AS?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 69 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Destination LE2 or Firehawk AS?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 70 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology