Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 5 reviews
Firestone Firehawk 900 vs Firestone Multihawk 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Firehawk 900 is ahead, 71–50
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 43 · 182 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Firehawk 900 +1455Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 Multihawk 2 Reviews found online 70 48 -
73
Wet
Firehawk 900 +2449Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 Multihawk 2 Reviews found online 74 42 -
71
Comfort
Firehawk 900 +1754Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 Multihawk 2 Reviews found online 74 40 -
69
Treadwear
Firehawk 900 +2049Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 Multihawk 2 Reviews found online 72 38 -
76
Handling
Firehawk 900 +3343Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 Multihawk 2 Reviews found online 76 43
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Firehawk 900 | Firestone Multihawk 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 50 |
| Dry | 69 | 55 |
| Wet | 73 | 49 |
| Comfort | 71 | 54 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 49 |
| Handling | 76 | 43 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Firehawk 900
Multihawk 2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Firehawk 900
Pros
- Reliable wet and dry traction
- Strong durability and impact resistance against potholes
- High level of ride comfort and bump absorption
Cons
- Noticeable road noise, especially at lower speeds
- Run-flat variants may be unsuitable for certain vehicle suspension setups
- Dry grip performance can degrade noticeably as the tire ages
Tire B Multihawk 2
Pros
- Reliable dry grip and handling performance
- High ride comfort and low noise levels
- Affordable price and good overall value
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction and dangerous sliding behavior in rain
- Pronounced understeer on wet surfaces
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Firehawk 900 | B · Firestone Multihawk 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 22 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 14″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone Firehawk 900
Firestone Multihawk 2
Winner: Firestone Firehawk 900 — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 76 vs 43 on handling.
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 73 vs 49 on wet.
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 69 vs 49 on treadwear.
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 71 vs 54 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.