Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Firehawk 900 vs Nexen N2000 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Firehawk 900 is ahead, 74–68

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N2000
Tire BNexen

N2000

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 14 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Firehawk 900 +6
    67
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk 900N2000
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7667

    Firehawk 900: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 73

    N2000: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67

    No road tests of dry for Firehawk 900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for N2000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 75

    Wet

    Firehawk 900 +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk 900N2000
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7670

    Firehawk 900: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.1 = 75

    N2000: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 70

    No road tests of wet for Firehawk 900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for N2000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 76

    Comfort

    Firehawk 900 +10
    66
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk 900N2000
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7965

    Firehawk 900: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 79 = 76

    N2000: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.2 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for Firehawk 900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for N2000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 71

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk 900N2000
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online78–

    Firehawk 900: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 77.9 = 71

    No road tests of noise for Firehawk 900. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 73

    Treadwear

    Firehawk 900 +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk 900N2000
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7770

    Firehawk 900: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 73

    N2000: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk 900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for N2000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 79

    Handling (owners)

    Firehawk 900 +16
    63
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk 900N2000
    Reviews found online7963
Scores at a glance
Firestone Firehawk 900 vs Nexen N2000: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone Firehawk 900Nexen N2000
Relative Score 74 68
Dry 73 67
Wet 75 70
Comfort 76 66
Noise 71 –
Treadwear 73 69
Handling (owners) 79 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Firehawk 900

± 8

N2000

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Firehawk 900

Pros

  • Reliable and safe grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Good ride comfort and bump absorption on rough or uneven roads
  • Attractive aesthetic appearance

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise, especially reported with run-flat versions at lower speeds or with windows down
  • Potential to receive older, pre-dated stock from retailers affecting rubber longevity
  • Dry grip can diminish as the tire ages
All owner themes in the Firehawk 900 review

Tire B N2000

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money
  • Strong dry road grip and handling feedback
  • Surprisingly durable tread life for many users

Cons

  • Significant decline in wet-weather traction as tread depth decreases
  • Increased road noise and harsh ride quality reported by some users
  • Potential for uneven wear patterns if not properly maintained
All owner themes in the N2000 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Firehawk 900 B · Nexen N2000
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
UTQG300 A A340 - 440 A - AA A
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure42 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Firehawk 900

Nexen N2000

Winner: Firestone Firehawk 900 — better handling, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Firestone Firehawk 900 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Nexen N2000 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 79 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 76 vs 66 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 73 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 75 vs 70 on wet.

Tire A · Firestone Firehawk 900
Tire B · Nexen N2000

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firehawk 900 or N2000?

Which is better in the wet, Firehawk 900 or N2000?

Firestone Firehawk 900, 75 vs 70 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk 900 or N2000?

Firestone Firehawk 900, 73 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Firehawk 900 or N2000?

Firestone Firehawk 900, 76 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Firehawk 900 or N2000?

Firestone Firehawk 900, 73 vs 69 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology