Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 7 reviews
Firestone Firehawk 900 vs Nexen N6000 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 63 owner reviews. How we score
Firehawk 900 is ahead, 74–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Firehawk 900 +1063Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 N6000 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 76 60 Firehawk 900: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 73
N6000: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 63
No road tests of dry for Firehawk 900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for N6000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
75
Wet
Firehawk 900 +1164Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 N6000 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 76 61 Firehawk 900: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.1 = 75
N6000: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 64
No road tests of wet for Firehawk 900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for N6000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
76
Comfort
Firehawk 900 +1462Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 N6000 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 79 58 Firehawk 900: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 79 = 76
N6000: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58.4 = 62
No road tests of comfort for Firehawk 900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for N6000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
71
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 N6000 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 78 – Firehawk 900: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 77.9 = 71
No road tests of noise for Firehawk 900. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
73
Treadwear
Firehawk 900 +1360Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 N6000 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 77 57 Firehawk 900: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 73
N6000: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 56.5 = 60
No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk 900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for N6000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
Firehawk 900 +2554Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 N6000 Reviews found online 79 54
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Firehawk 900 | Nexen N6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 62 |
| Dry | 73 | 63 |
| Wet | 75 | 64 |
| Comfort | 76 | 62 |
| Noise | 71 | – |
| Treadwear | 73 | 60 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 54 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Firehawk 900
N6000
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Firehawk 900
Pros
- Reliable and safe grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Good ride comfort and bump absorption on rough or uneven roads
- Attractive aesthetic appearance
Cons
- Noticeable road noise, especially reported with run-flat versions at lower speeds or with windows down
- Potential to receive older, pre-dated stock from retailers affecting rubber longevity
- Dry grip can diminish as the tire ages
Tire B N6000
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Strong dry-weather traction and handling
- Competitive noise levels compared to other budget alternatives
Cons
- Inconsistent and sometimes dangerous wet-weather grip
- Rapid or uneven tread wear reported by many users
- Noticeable decline in performance as tread depth decreases
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Firehawk 900 | B · Nexen N6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| UTQG | 300 A A | 300 AA A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 42 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone Firehawk 900
Nexen N6000
Winner: Firestone Firehawk 900 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Firestone Firehawk 900 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 79 vs 54 on handling.
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 76 vs 62 on comfort.
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 73 vs 60 on treadwear.
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 75 vs 64 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Firehawk 900 or N6000?
Which is better in the wet, Firehawk 900 or N6000?
Firestone Firehawk 900, 75 vs 64 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk 900 or N6000?
Firestone Firehawk 900, 73 vs 63 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Firehawk 900 or N6000?
Firestone Firehawk 900, 76 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Firehawk 900 or N6000?
Firestone Firehawk 900, 73 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology