Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 8 reviews
General AltiMAX RT looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Firestone Firehawk AS vs General AltiMAX RT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Firehawk AS 64, AltiMAX RT 65.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 11 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Level65Why this score
Source Firehawk AS AltiMAX RT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 64 64 Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65
AltiMAX RT: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.7 = 65
No road tests of dry for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
65
Wet
AltiMAX RT +267Why this score
Source Firehawk AS AltiMAX RT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 64 66 Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65
AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 67
No road tests of wet for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
61
Snow
Level61Why this score
Source Firehawk AS AltiMAX RT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 56 55 Firehawk AS: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 61
AltiMAX RT: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 55 = 61
No road tests of snow for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
65
Comfort
Level65Why this score
Source Firehawk AS AltiMAX RT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 61 62 Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 65
AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.5 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Firehawk AS or AltiMAX RT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Noise
Firehawk AS +166Why this score
Source Firehawk AS AltiMAX RT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 67 65 Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 67
AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66
No road tests of noise for Firehawk AS or AltiMAX RT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
Firehawk AS +165Why this score
Source Firehawk AS AltiMAX RT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 66 64 Firehawk AS: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66
AltiMAX RT: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
61
Handling (owners)
AltiMAX RT +364Why this score
Source Firehawk AS AltiMAX RT Reviews found online 61 64
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Firehawk AS | General AltiMAX RT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 65 |
| Dry | 65 | 65 |
| Wet | 65 | 67 |
| Snow | 61 | 61 |
| Comfort | 65 | 65 |
| Noise | 67 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Firehawk AS
AltiMAX RT
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Firehawk AS
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
- Strong dry handling and improved cornering response
- Good water dispersion and wet road performance for most users
Cons
- Potential susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain according to select reviewers
- Requires proper balancing to prevent irregular tread wear
Tire B AltiMAX RT
Pros
- Affordable price point offering high value
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality suitable for large sedans
- Reliable all-around traction in both wet and dry conditions
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather performance reported by some users
- Premature tread wear down to 30,000 miles in isolated experiences
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Firehawk AS | B · General AltiMAX RT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season High Performance tires | All-Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | — |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 480 A A | 440 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone Firehawk AS
General AltiMAX RT
Too close to call: Firestone Firehawk AS and General AltiMAX RT are within 2 points overall. Firestone Firehawk AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional. General AltiMAX RT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Firehawk AS or AltiMAX RT?
Which is better in the wet, Firehawk AS or AltiMAX RT?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk AS or AltiMAX RT?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Firehawk AS or AltiMAX RT?
Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 61 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Firehawk AS or AltiMAX RT?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 66 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Firehawk AS or AltiMAX RT?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Firehawk AS or AltiMAX RT?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology