tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Firehawk AS vs Goodyear Eagle LS-2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 148 owner reviews. How we score

Firehawk AS is ahead, 69–57

Check price on Amazon · Firehawk AS or Eagle LS-2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Firehawk AS
Tire AFirestone

Firehawk AS

All Season High Performance tires

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 8 reviews

Goodyear Eagle LS-2
Tire BGoodyear

Eagle LS-2

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 148 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Firehawk AS +15
    55
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7149

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.6 = 55

    No road tests of dry for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 69

    Wet

    Firehawk AS +8
    61
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6857

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 56.9 = 61

    No road tests of wet for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 66

    Snow

    Firehawk AS +6
    60
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6253

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 66

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 60

    No road tests of snow for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    Firehawk AS +12
    57
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6952

    Firehawk AS: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.8 = 69

    Eagle LS-2: 40% × 65.2 (est.) + 60% × 51.6 = 57

    No road tests of comfort for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 70

    Noise

    Firehawk AS +8
    62
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7456

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 70

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 62

    No road tests of noise for Firehawk AS or Eagle LS-2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Firehawk AS +15
    55
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7248

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 70

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 48 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    Firehawk AS +18
    49
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASEagle LS-2
    Reviews found online6749
Scores at a glance
CategoryFirestone Firehawk ASGoodyear Eagle LS-2
Relative Score 69 57
Dry 70 55
Wet 69 61
Snow 66 60
Comfort 69 57
Noise 70 62
Treadwear 70 55
Handling (owners) 67 49

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Firehawk AS

± 7

Eagle LS-2

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Firehawk AS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Strong dry handling and improved cornering response
  • Good water dispersion and wet road performance for most users

Cons

  • Potential susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain according to select reviewers
  • Requires proper balancing to prevent irregular tread wear
All owner themes in the Firehawk AS review

Tire B Eagle LS-2

Pros

  • Low road noise and exceptional ride comfort
  • Precise dry handling and solid straight-line stability
  • Good overall value and fuel efficiency

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter lifespan for some drivers
  • Increased road noise over time due to cupping
  • Mediocre wet and winter traction when worn
All owner themes in the Eagle LS-2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Firehawk AS B · Goodyear Eagle LS-2
CategoryAll Season High Performance tiresAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available522
Rim diameters15″ – 18″15″ – 20″
Tread depth11/32″9 - 12/32″
UTQG480 A A360 - 400 A A - B
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band
Max pressure44 psi44 - 51 psi
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Firehawk AS

Goodyear Eagle LS-2

Winner: Firestone Firehawk AS — better handling, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Firestone Firehawk AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 67 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 70 vs 55 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 70 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 69 vs 57 on comfort.

Tire A · Firestone Firehawk AS
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle LS-2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firehawk AS or Eagle LS-2?

Which is better in the wet, Firehawk AS or Eagle LS-2?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 69 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk AS or Eagle LS-2?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 70 vs 55 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Firehawk AS or Eagle LS-2?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 66 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Firehawk AS or Eagle LS-2?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 70 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Firehawk AS or Eagle LS-2?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 69 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Firehawk AS or Eagle LS-2?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 70 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology