Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Firehawk AS vs Michelin Pilot Sport — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 43 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport leads, 73–69 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Firehawk AS
Tire AFirestone

Firehawk AS

All Season High Performance tires

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 8 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Pilot Sport +7
    77
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASPilot Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online7182

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.2 = 70

    Pilot Sport: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 81.6 = 77

    No road tests of dry for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 69

    Wet

    Pilot Sport +7
    76
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASPilot Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online6978

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69

    Pilot Sport: 60% × 74.8 (est.) + 40% × 78 = 76

    No road tests of wet for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 66

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASPilot Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)–
    Reviews found online63–

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    Firehawk AS +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASPilot Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7068

    Firehawk AS: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 69.6 = 69

    Pilot Sport: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 68 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Firehawk AS or Pilot Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASPilot Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online74–

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Firehawk AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    Firehawk AS +5
    64
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASPilot Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7263

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 69

    Pilot Sport: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport +9
    76
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASPilot Sport
    Reviews found online6776
Scores at a glance
Firestone Firehawk AS vs Michelin Pilot Sport: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone Firehawk ASMichelin Pilot Sport
Relative Score 69 73
Dry 70 77
Wet 69 76
Snow 66 –
Comfort 69 68
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 69 64
Handling (owners) 67 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Firehawk AS

± 8

Pilot Sport

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Firehawk AS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Strong dry handling and improved cornering response
  • Good water dispersion and wet road performance for most users

Cons

  • Potential susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain according to select reviewers
  • Requires proper balancing to prevent irregular tread wear
All owner themes in the Firehawk AS review

Tire B Pilot Sport

Pros

  • Outstanding dry grip and handling performance
  • Stiff sidewalls providing sharp steering feedback and turn-in
  • Good wet weather performance and water channeling

Cons

  • Higher price point compared to competitors
  • Increased road noise, particularly on rough or chipped road surfaces
  • Subpar grip and traction when tires are cold
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Firehawk AS B · Michelin Pilot Sport
CategoryAll Season High Performance tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available42
Rim diameters15″ – 18″18″
Tread depth11/32″—
UTQG480 A A—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Firehawk AS

Michelin Pilot Sport

Narrow edge: Michelin Pilot Sport — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Firestone Firehawk AS if treadwear matters most to you. Firestone Firehawk AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport scores 76 vs 67 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport scores 77 vs 70 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport scores 76 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 69 vs 64 on treadwear.

Tire A · Firestone Firehawk AS
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firehawk AS or Pilot Sport?

Which is better in the wet, Firehawk AS or Pilot Sport?

Michelin Pilot Sport, 76 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk AS or Pilot Sport?

Michelin Pilot Sport, 77 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Firehawk AS or Pilot Sport?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Firehawk AS or Pilot Sport?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 69 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology