Nexen N FERA SUR4 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Firehawk AS vs Nexen N FERA SUR4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

Firehawk AS leads, 65–62 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Firehawk AS
Tire AFirestone

Firehawk AS

All Season High Performance tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 8 reviews

Nexen N FERA SUR4
Tire BNexen

N FERA SUR4

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    N FERA SUR4 +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6473

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 71

    No road tests of dry for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 65

    Wet

    Firehawk AS +10
    55
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online6450

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 55

    No road tests of wet for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 61

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online56–

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 61

    No road tests of snow for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    Firehawk AS +5
    60
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6151

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 65

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for Firehawk AS or N FERA SUR4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online67–

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Firehawk AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Firehawk AS +11
    55
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6647

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 46.7 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    N FERA SUR4 +10
    71
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASN FERA SUR4
    Reviews found online6171
Scores at a glance
Firestone Firehawk AS vs Nexen N FERA SUR4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone Firehawk ASNexen N FERA SUR4
Relative Score 65 62
Dry 65 71
Wet 65 55
Snow 61 –
Comfort 65 60
Noise 67 –
Treadwear 66 55
Handling (owners) 61 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Firehawk AS

N FERA SUR4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Firehawk AS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Strong dry handling and improved cornering response
  • Good water dispersion and wet road performance for most users

Cons

  • Potential susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain according to select reviewers
  • Requires proper balancing to prevent irregular tread wear
All owner themes in the Firehawk AS review

Tire B N FERA SUR4

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
  • Precise steering feedback and predictable handling
  • Cost-effective alternative to more expensive track tires

Cons

  • High level of road noise
  • Poor wet-weather performance and dangerous hydroplaning tendencies in heavy rain
  • Fast tread wear
All owner themes in the N FERA SUR4 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Firehawk AS B · Nexen N FERA SUR4
CategoryAll Season High Performance tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4—
Rim diameters15″ – 18″—
Tread depth11/32″—
UTQG480 A A—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Firehawk AS

Nexen N FERA SUR4

Narrow edge: Firestone Firehawk AS — better treadwear, wet and comfort. Pick the Nexen N FERA SUR4 if handling and dry matter most to you. Firestone Firehawk AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Nexen N FERA SUR4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 66 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 65 vs 55 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N FERA SUR4 scores 71 vs 61 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen N FERA SUR4 scores 71 vs 65 on dry.

Tire A · Firestone Firehawk AS
Tire B · Nexen N FERA SUR4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firehawk AS or N FERA SUR4?

Which is better in the wet, Firehawk AS or N FERA SUR4?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 65 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk AS or N FERA SUR4?

Nexen N FERA SUR4, 71 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Firehawk AS or N FERA SUR4?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 65 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Firehawk AS or N FERA SUR4?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 66 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology