Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Firehawk AS vs Nexen N5000+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

N5000+ leads, 71–69 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Firehawk AS
Tire AFirestone

Firehawk AS

All Season High Performance tires

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 8 reviews

Nexen N5000+
Tire BNexen

N5000+

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 5 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    N5000+ +3
    73
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASN5000+
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7176

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 70

    N5000+: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for N5000+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 69

    Wet

    N5000+ +4
    73
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASN5000+
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6975

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 69

    N5000+: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 74.5 = 73

    No road tests of wet for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for N5000+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 66

    Snow

    N5000+ +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASN5000+
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6365

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 66

    N5000+: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 67

    No road tests of snow for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for N5000+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    N5000+ +4
    73
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASN5000+
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7075

    Firehawk AS: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 69.5 = 69

    N5000+: 40% × 70.3 (est.) + 60% × 75.3 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for Firehawk AS or N5000+. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASN5000+
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online74–

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Firehawk AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Firehawk AS +4
    66
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASN5000+
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7266

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 70

    N5000+: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for N5000+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    N5000+ +8
    75
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASN5000+
    Reviews found online6775
Scores at a glance
Firestone Firehawk AS vs Nexen N5000+: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone Firehawk ASNexen N5000+
Relative Score 69 71
Dry 70 73
Wet 69 73
Snow 66 67
Comfort 69 73
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 70 66
Handling (owners) 67 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Firehawk AS

± 8

N5000+

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Firehawk AS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Strong dry handling and improved cornering response
  • Good water dispersion and wet road performance for most users

Cons

  • Potential susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain according to select reviewers
  • Requires proper balancing to prevent irregular tread wear
All owner themes in the Firehawk AS review

Tire B N5000+

Pros

  • Excellent ride comfort and bump absorption
  • Quiet operation on various road surfaces
  • Reliable grip in dry and wet weather conditions

Cons

  • Premature tread wear significantly below the mileage warranty
  • Difficult and frustrating manufacturer warranty claim process
  • Softer sidewalls may feel less responsive than sportier alternatives
All owner themes in the N5000+ review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Firehawk AS B · Nexen N5000+
CategoryAll Season High Performance tiresAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4—
Rim diameters15″ – 18″—
Tread depth11/32″—
UTQG480 A A—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Firehawk AS

Nexen N5000+

Narrow edge: Nexen N5000+ — better handling, wet and comfort. Pick the Firestone Firehawk AS if treadwear matters most to you. Firestone Firehawk AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Nexen N5000+ rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N5000+ scores 75 vs 67 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 70 vs 66 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen N5000+ scores 73 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N5000+ scores 73 vs 69 on comfort.

Tire A · Firestone Firehawk AS
Tire B · Nexen N5000+

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firehawk AS or N5000+?

Which is better in the wet, Firehawk AS or N5000+?

Nexen N5000+, 73 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk AS or N5000+?

Nexen N5000+, 73 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Firehawk AS or N5000+?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 67 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Firehawk AS or N5000+?

Nexen N5000+, 73 vs 69 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Firehawk AS or N5000+?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 70 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology