Firestone Firehawk GT looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head

Firestone Firehawk GT vs Yokohama Geolandar G91A — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Firehawk GT and Geolandar G91A are level at 38.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Firehawk GT
Tire AFirestone

Firehawk GT

All-Season tire

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 19 · 4 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 40

    Dry

    Firehawk GT +3
    37
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk GTGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 50 (est.)≈ 49 (est.)
    Reviews found online2421

    Firehawk GT: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 24.1 = 40

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 48.7 (est.) + 40% × 20.5 = 37

    No road tests of dry for Firehawk GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 35

    Wet

    Firehawk GT +3
    32
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk GTGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 43 (est.)≈ 41 (est.)
    Reviews found online2219

    Firehawk GT: 60% × 43 (est.) + 40% × 22 = 35

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 41.3 (est.) + 40% × 18.9 = 32

    No road tests of wet for Firehawk GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 40

    Snow

    Geolandar G91A +8
    48
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk GTGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 53 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online1933

    Firehawk GT: 60% × 53.1 (est.) + 40% × 19.2 = 40

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 57.5 (est.) + 40% × 32.5 = 48

    No road tests of snow for Firehawk GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 40

    Comfort

    Geolandar G91A +1
    41
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk GTGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online1214

    Firehawk GT: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 12.2 = 40

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 14.1 = 41

    No road tests of comfort for Firehawk GT or Geolandar G91A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 44

    Noise

    Geolandar G91A +8
    52
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk GTGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online1029

    Firehawk GT: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 44

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 29 = 52

    No road tests of noise for Firehawk GT or Geolandar G91A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 36

    Treadwear

    Geolandar G91A +3
    39
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk GTGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 50 (est.)≈ 52 (est.)
    Reviews found online1520

    Firehawk GT: 60% × 50 (est.) + 40% × 14.8 = 36

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 51.6 (est.) + 40% × 20.1 = 39

    No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 28

    Handling (owners)

    Firehawk GT +5
    23
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk GTGeolandar G91A
    Reviews found online2823
Scores at a glance
Firestone Firehawk GT vs Yokohama Geolandar G91A: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone Firehawk GTYokohama Geolandar G91A
Relative Score 38 38
Dry 40 37
Wet 35 32
Snow 40 48
Comfort 40 41
Noise 44 52
Treadwear 36 39
Handling (owners) 28 23

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Firehawk GT

Geolandar G91A

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Firehawk GT B · Yokohama Geolandar G91A
CategoryAll-Season tireAll-Season tire
Vehicle type—SUV and 4x4
Tread depth11/32″10/32″
UTQG460 A A280 B A
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Firehawk GT

Yokohama Geolandar G91A

Too close to call: Firestone Firehawk GT and Yokohama Geolandar G91A are within 2 points overall. Firestone Firehawk GT is stronger on dry and wet. Yokohama Geolandar G91A is stronger on snow, noise and treadwear. Firestone Firehawk GT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Geolandar G91A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama Geolandar G91A scores 48 vs 40 on snow.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Yokohama Geolandar G91A scores 52 vs 44 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Firehawk GT scores 40 vs 37 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Firestone Firehawk GT scores 35 vs 32 on wet.

Tire A · Firestone Firehawk GT
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G91A

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firehawk GT or Geolandar G91A?

Which is better in the wet, Firehawk GT or Geolandar G91A?

Firestone Firehawk GT, 35 vs 32 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk GT or Geolandar G91A?

Firestone Firehawk GT, 40 vs 37 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Firehawk GT or Geolandar G91A?

Yokohama Geolandar G91A, 48 vs 40 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Firehawk GT or Geolandar G91A?

Yokohama Geolandar G91A, 52 vs 44 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Firehawk GT or Geolandar G91A?

Neither, by our numbers: 40 vs 41 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Firehawk GT or Geolandar G91A?

Yokohama Geolandar G91A, 39 vs 36 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology