Tests 54 · 2 tests Owners 52 · 25 reviews
Firestone Firehawk SZ90 vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 19 road tests and 25 + 3,376 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus S1 evo3 is ahead, 70–55
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 19 tests Owners 57 · 3,376 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (wet braking)
“Tire preferences? My MK8 has a little over 18,000 miles now and the stock tires look like they’ve already gone to sh*t? Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 aren’t as good as they advertise? What do you recommend for tires?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
55
Dry
Ventus S1 evo3 +2075Why this score
Source Firehawk SZ90 Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 18 tests 58 86 Reviews found online 51 60 Firehawk SZ90: 60% × 57.9 + 40% × 51.3 = 55
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 85.6 + 40% × 59.8 = 75
-
53
Wet
Ventus S1 evo3 +2881Why this score
Source Firehawk SZ90 Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 18 tests 51 90 Reviews found online 56 68 Firehawk SZ90: 60% × 50.8 + 40% × 56 = 53
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 89.6 + 40% × 68 = 81
-
52
Comfort
Ventus S1 evo3 +759Why this score
Source Firehawk SZ90 Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 64 Reviews found online 45 56 Firehawk SZ90: 40% × 63.8 (est.) + 60% × 44.7 = 52
Ventus S1 evo3: 40% × 64.4 + 60% × 55.8 = 59
No road tests of comfort for Firehawk SZ90. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
58
Noise
Ventus S1 evo3 +1573Why this score
Source Firehawk SZ90 Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 14 tests 53 77 Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Firehawk SZ90: 60% × 52.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 58
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 73
No owner ratings of noise for Firehawk SZ90 or Ventus S1 evo3. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
57
Treadwear
Firehawk SZ90 +453Why this score
Source Firehawk SZ90 Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 61 Reviews found online 51 42 Firehawk SZ90: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 51.2 = 57
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 60.8 + 40% × 41.5 = 53
No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk SZ90. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
53
Handling (owners)
Ventus S1 evo3 +659Why this score
Source Firehawk SZ90 Ventus S1 evo3 Reviews found online 53 59 -
62
Efficiency
Ventus S1 evo3 +668Why this score
Source Firehawk SZ90 Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 15 tests 62 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Firehawk SZ90 | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 55 | 70 |
| Dry | 55 | 75 |
| Wet | 53 | 81 |
| Comfort | 52 | 59 |
| Noise | 58 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 53 |
| Handling (owners) | 53 | 59 |
| Efficiency | 62 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Firehawk SZ90
Ventus S1 evo3
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Firehawk SZ90 | Ventus S1 evo3 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 91% #8/9 · 2017 Auto Bild Sports Cars Tyre Test | 96% #7/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 97% #9/9 · 2017 Auto Bild Sports Cars Tyre Test | 98% #7/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 82% #8/9 · 2017 Auto Bild Sports Cars Tyre Test | 94% #6/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 95% #8/9 · 2017 Auto Bild Sports Cars Tyre Test | 100% #2/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 95% #9/9 · 2017 Auto Bild UHP Tyre Test | 100% #1/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 85% #8/9 · 2017 Auto Bild UHP Tyre Test | 97% #3/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/9 2017 Auto Bild Sports Cars Tyre Test | #6/8 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Firehawk SZ90
Pros
- Strong dry and wet surface grip
- Effective water displacement and braking performance
- Competitive price point
Cons
- Excessive road noise
- Rapid or uneven tread wear
- Unpredictable handling and stability issues
Tire B Ventus S1 evo3
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in wet and dry conditions
- Low road noise and high ride comfort
- Competitive pricing compared to premium tier-one brands
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on rear axles or heavy vehicles
- Soft sidewalls leading to reduced steering feedback and precision
- Vulnerability to sidewall damage or bubbling from potholes
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Firestone Firehawk SZ90
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Community sentiment toward the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3 is mixed, with users frequently praising its strong dry and wet grip, comfort, and competitive pricing. However, notable drawbacks include relatively fast tread wear, reports of increasing road noise over time, and mixed experiences with OEM specs versus premium competitors like Michelin.
“Tire preferences? My MK8 has a little over 18,000 miles now and the stock tires look like they’ve already gone to sh*t? Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 aren’t as good as they advertise? What do you recommend for tires?”
“Small tire size change having different ratings? (Hankook Ventus S1 Evo3) Hi all, I'm looking for a good all round tire for my MX5 (I'm in the non snowy regions of the UK so summer tires) and a pretty popular recommendation are the Ventus S1 Evo 3s. At the MX5's stock size of 205/45/R17 they are rated at A for fuel and wet performance, and 68db of noise, which is great! However I'd like to size up to 215/45/R17, and for whatever reason the ratings drop to B for fuel and wet performance, and most importantly to me, 71db of noise. I was just wondering how such a small difference in size changes things quite drastically? I know these ratings aren't that important, but it seems strange to me they'd change at all Thanks! Read more”
“You will love the Ventus S1 EVO3's, I purchased a set back in May 2020 for $473 delivered. In your climate driving at Texas speeds (75-85) efficiency is gonna be about 270-295 Wh/m. I just ordered a set of the iON EVO AS to try out as I have a need for snow use but not bad enough for snow tires.”
Based on 33 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Firehawk SZ90 | B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 110 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 22″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 - 420 A - AA A |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone Firehawk SZ90
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — better wet, dry and noise. Pick the Firestone Firehawk SZ90 if treadwear matters most to you.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 81 vs 53 on wet.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 75 vs 55 on dry.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 73 vs 58 on noise.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 59 vs 52 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Firehawk SZ90 or Ventus S1 evo3?
Which is better in the wet, Firehawk SZ90 or Ventus S1 evo3?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 81 vs 53 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk SZ90 or Ventus S1 evo3?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 75 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Firehawk SZ90 or Ventus S1 evo3?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 73 vs 58 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Firehawk SZ90 or Ventus S1 evo3?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 59 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Firehawk SZ90 or Ventus S1 evo3?
Firestone Firehawk SZ90, 57 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, Firehawk SZ90 or Ventus S1 evo3?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 68 vs 62 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology