tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Multihawk 2 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 182 + 1,595 owner reviews. How we score

Kinergy Eco 2 is ahead, 60–44

Check price on Amazon · Kinergy Eco 2 or Multihawk 2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
Tire BHankook

Kinergy Eco 2

Summer

± 6

Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 50 · 1,595 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 48

    Dry

    Kinergy Eco 2 +15
    63
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawk 2Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 55 (est.)72
    Reviews found online3750

    Multihawk 2: 60% × 55.3 (est.) + 40% × 37.3 = 48

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 49.5 = 63

    No road tests of dry for Multihawk 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 44

    Wet

    Kinergy Eco 2 +22
    66
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawk 2Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 50 (est.)75
    Reviews found online3353

    Multihawk 2: 60% × 50.3 (est.) + 40% × 33.4 = 44

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 53.4 = 66

    No road tests of wet for Multihawk 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 43

    Comfort

    Kinergy Eco 2 +10
    53
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawk 2Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online3145

    Multihawk 2: 40% × 61.1 (est.) + 60% × 31.1 = 43

    Kinergy Eco 2: 40% × 64 (est.) + 60% × 45.3 = 53

    No road tests of comfort for Multihawk 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Kinergy Eco 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawk 2Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–75
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 71

    No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy Eco 2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 43

    Treadwear

    Kinergy Eco 2 +12
    55
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawk 2Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 53 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online2948

    Multihawk 2: 60% × 52.9 (est.) + 40% × 28.8 = 43

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 47.6 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for Multihawk 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Kinergy Eco 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 37

    Handling (owners)

    Kinergy Eco 2 +12
    49
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawk 2Kinergy Eco 2
    Reviews found online3749
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    75
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawk 2Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–75
Scores at a glance
CategoryFirestone Multihawk 2Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
Relative Score 44 60
Dry 48 63
Wet 44 66
Comfort 43 53
Noise – 71
Treadwear 43 55
Handling (owners) 37 49
Efficiency – 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Multihawk 2

± 6

Kinergy Eco 2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryMultihawk 2Kinergy Eco 2ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #12/14 2018 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 175/65 R14 #8/11 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Multihawk 2

Pros

  • Reliable dry grip and handling performance
  • High ride comfort and low noise levels
  • Affordable price and good overall value

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction and dangerous sliding behavior in rain
  • Pronounced understeer on wet surfaces
  • Rapid tread wear reported by some users
All owner themes in the Multihawk 2 review

Tire B Kinergy Eco 2

Pros

  • Reliable dry and wet road grip
  • Good value for the price point
  • Slow and even tread wear / long-lasting durability

Cons

  • Notable road noise reported by some users
  • Stiff ride quality that can amplify road bumps
  • Reduced performance and grip in wet or cold conditions as tread wears down
All owner themes in the Kinergy Eco 2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Multihawk 2 B · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2248
Rim diameters13″ – 14″13″ – 17″
UTQG—200 - 400 A - B A
Sizes in common1919

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Multihawk 2

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2

Winner: Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 — better wet, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 66 vs 44 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 63 vs 48 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 55 vs 43 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 49 vs 37 on handling.

Tire A · Firestone Multihawk 2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Multihawk 2 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Which is better in the wet, Multihawk 2 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2, 66 vs 44 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Multihawk 2 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2, 63 vs 48 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Multihawk 2 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2, 53 vs 43 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Multihawk 2 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2, 55 vs 43 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology