Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 17 reviews
Firestone Winterforce 2 UV vs Cooper Evolution Tour — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 17 + 674 owner reviews. How we score
Evolution Tour leads, 68–66 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 674 reviews
“I have Cooper Evolution Tours on my Equinox. No major complaints, but would probably move up to the Discoverer line in the future. The Evolution Tours ride nice and are very quiet, but there is no way they will go 65,000 miles as indicated by Cooper. I have just about 17,000 miles on them, and they are already down to 6/32 on all four despite rotating them every 5,000-7,000 miles. Next time I get tires I want to try one of the new "severe weather rated" tires. Considering either the Cooper Discoverer Enduramax or Falken Wildpeak A/T Trail.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Evolution Tour +469Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 UV Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 64 69 Winterforce 2 UV: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 65
Evolution Tour: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69
No road tests of dry for Winterforce 2 UV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
70
Wet
Evolution Tour +272Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 UV Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 70 72 Winterforce 2 UV: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70
Evolution Tour: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.1 = 72
No road tests of wet for Winterforce 2 UV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
72
Snow
Winterforce 2 UV +1458Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 UV Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 73 49 Winterforce 2 UV: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 72
Evolution Tour: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 49.3 = 58
No road tests of snow for Winterforce 2 UV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
61
Comfort
Evolution Tour +768Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 UV Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 57 67 Winterforce 2 UV: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 57 = 61
Evolution Tour: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 67.2 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Winterforce 2 UV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
61
Noise
Evolution Tour +768Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 UV Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 54 70 Winterforce 2 UV: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 54 = 61
Evolution Tour: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 68
No road tests of noise for Winterforce 2 UV or Evolution Tour. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Treadwear
Evolution Tour +870Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 UV Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 59 72 Winterforce 2 UV: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 62
Evolution Tour: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Winterforce 2 UV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison68Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 UV Evolution Tour Reviews found online – 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Winterforce 2 UV | Cooper Evolution Tour |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 68 |
| Dry | 65 | 69 |
| Wet | 70 | 72 |
| Snow | 72 | 58 |
| Comfort | 61 | 68 |
| Noise | 61 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Winterforce 2 UV
Evolution Tour
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Winterforce 2 UV
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Evolution Tour
Pros
- Excellent value for the price point
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
- Strong wet-weather traction and water displacement
Cons
- Tread life often fails to meet mileage warranty expectations
- Inconsistent noise levels reported by some users
- Potential for premature wear compared to premium competitors like Michelin
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Firestone Winterforce 2 UV
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Cooper Evolution Tour
Community members report that the Cooper Evolution Tour offers a smooth, quiet ride and decent performance that often surpasses certain OEM tires. However, multiple users express disappointment regarding treadwear, noting that the tires wear down significantly faster than their advertised 65,000-mile warranty suggests.
“No one recommending Cooper tires? Hey everyone!! My very first car is a 2019 honda fit EX and I'm new to pretty much everything in regards to it. I've had it since May of last year. I don't see any recommendations for Cooper tires. Is there a reason for this? I'm looking into the Cooper Evolution Tour All Season. My dad (who used to be a mechanic) suggests them, and they're available at the closest Walmart. I'm also looking into Yokohama, but they'll have to be shipped and they're 20$ more per tire. I'll most likely replace all four. I'm at 32k miles, but my rear passenger tire blew out the other day. The car still has the stock tires. Read more”
“It appears the Endeavor might be one step above the Evolution based on the Cooper website and their performance chart that compares tires to other Cooper tires. I like the performance characteristics of my Cooper Evolution Tour tires, I just wish the tread wear was a little better, especially for a 65,000 mile rated tire. I am down to 5/32 tread depth on all four tires after only 20,000 miles.”
Based on 6 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Winterforce 2 UV | B · Cooper Evolution Tour |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter tire | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 30 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | — |
| Tread depth | 12/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 580 - 600 A A - B |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone Winterforce 2 UV
Cooper Evolution Tour
Narrow edge: Cooper Evolution Tour — better treadwear, comfort and noise. Pick the Firestone Winterforce 2 UV if snow matters most to you. Firestone Winterforce 2 UV rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Firestone Winterforce 2 UV scores 72 vs 58 on snow.
Cooper Evolution Tour scores 70 vs 62 on treadwear.
Cooper Evolution Tour scores 68 vs 61 on comfort.
Cooper Evolution Tour scores 68 vs 61 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Winterforce 2 UV or Evolution Tour?
Which is better in the wet, Winterforce 2 UV or Evolution Tour?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 72 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Winterforce 2 UV or Evolution Tour?
Cooper Evolution Tour, 69 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Winterforce 2 UV or Evolution Tour?
Firestone Winterforce 2 UV, 72 vs 58 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Winterforce 2 UV or Evolution Tour?
Cooper Evolution Tour, 68 vs 61 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Winterforce 2 UV or Evolution Tour?
Cooper Evolution Tour, 68 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Winterforce 2 UV or Evolution Tour?
Cooper Evolution Tour, 70 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology