Tests – · none yet Owners 80 · 19 reviews
Continental TrueContact Tour vs Cooper Evolution Tour — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 19 + 674 owner reviews. How we score
TrueContact Tour is ahead, 76–68
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 674 reviews
“It appears the Endeavor might be one step above the Evolution based on the Cooper website and their performance chart that compares tires to other Cooper tires. I like the performance characteristics of my Cooper Evolution Tour tires, I just wish the tread wear was a little better, especially for a 65,000 mile rated tire. I am down to 5/32 tread depth on all four tires after only 20,000 miles.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
TrueContact Tour +868Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 80 69 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 80 = 76
Evolution Tour: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68
No road tests of dry for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
80
Wet
TrueContact Tour +971Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 78 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 84 71 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 77.8 (est.) + 40% × 84.1 = 80
Evolution Tour: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 71
No road tests of wet for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
70
Snow
TrueContact Tour +1159Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 70 52 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 70
Evolution Tour: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 51.8 = 59
No road tests of snow for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
74
Comfort
TrueContact Tour +569Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 79 69 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 74
Evolution Tour: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 69
No road tests of comfort for TrueContact Tour or Evolution Tour. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
72
Noise
TrueContact Tour +369Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 78 71 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.3 = 72
Evolution Tour: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 69
No road tests of noise for TrueContact Tour or Evolution Tour. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
75
Treadwear
TrueContact Tour +768Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 81 70 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 81.1 = 75
Evolution Tour: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
78
Handling (owners)
TrueContact Tour +969Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Evolution Tour Reviews found online 78 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental TrueContact Tour | Cooper Evolution Tour |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 68 |
| Dry | 76 | 68 |
| Wet | 80 | 71 |
| Snow | 70 | 59 |
| Comfort | 74 | 69 |
| Noise | 72 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | 78 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
TrueContact Tour
Evolution Tour
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A TrueContact Tour
Pros
- Extremely low road noise and a comfortable ride quality that absorbs bumps well
- Impressive tread life and overall mileage durability
- Reliable wet weather grip and cornering confidence
Cons
- Some users reported a noticeable drop in fuel economy
- Desire for improved water displacement grooves to better handle heavy rain
- Limited performance in deep winter or heavy snow conditions
Tire B Evolution Tour
Pros
- Excellent value for the price point
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
- Strong wet-weather traction and water displacement
Cons
- Tread life often fails to meet mileage warranty expectations
- Inconsistent noise levels reported by some users
- Potential for premature wear compared to premium competitors like Michelin
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental TrueContact Tour
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Cooper Evolution Tour
Community members praise the Cooper Evolution Tour for its quiet, comfortable ride and solid baseline performance compared to OEM alternatives. However, users consistently express disappointment regarding rapid tread wear, noting the tire wears down much faster than its 65,000-mile rating suggests.
“It appears the Endeavor might be one step above the Evolution based on the Cooper website and their performance chart that compares tires to other Cooper tires. I like the performance characteristics of my Cooper Evolution Tour tires, I just wish the tread wear was a little better, especially for a 65,000 mile rated tire. I am down to 5/32 tread depth on all four tires after only 20,000 miles.”
“I have Cooper Evolution Tours on my Equinox. No major complaints, but would probably move up to the Discoverer line in the future. The Evolution Tours ride nice and are very quiet, but there is no way they will go 65,000 miles as indicated by Cooper. I have just about 17,000 miles on them, and they are already down to 6/32 on all four despite rotating them every 5,000-7,000 miles. Next time I get tires I want to try one of the new "severe weather rated" tires. Considering either the Cooper Discoverer Enduramax or Falken Wildpeak A/T Trail.”
Based on 6 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental TrueContact Tour | B · Cooper Evolution Tour |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 700 - 800 A A - B | 580 - 600 A A - B |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - White Wall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental TrueContact Tour
Cooper Evolution Tour
Winner: Continental TrueContact Tour — better snow, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental TrueContact Tour rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental TrueContact Tour scores 70 vs 59 on snow.
Continental TrueContact Tour scores 80 vs 71 on wet.
Continental TrueContact Tour scores 78 vs 69 on handling.
Continental TrueContact Tour scores 76 vs 68 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
TrueContact Tour or Evolution Tour?
Which is better in the wet, TrueContact Tour or Evolution Tour?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 80 vs 71 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, TrueContact Tour or Evolution Tour?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 76 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, TrueContact Tour or Evolution Tour?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 70 vs 59 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, TrueContact Tour or Evolution Tour?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 72 vs 69 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, TrueContact Tour or Evolution Tour?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 74 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, TrueContact Tour or Evolution Tour?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 75 vs 68 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology