Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Winterforce 2 vs General Grabber Arctic — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Grabber Arctic is ahead, 69–60

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AFirestone

Winterforce 2

Winter Premium Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 28 reviews

Best test result: #16 of 15 in 2022 Consumer Reports Winter Tires (overall ranking)

Tire BGeneral

Grabber Arctic

Winter

Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 18 reviews

Best test result: #4 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports Winter/Snow Truck/SUV Tires (overall ranking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 48

    Dry

    Grabber Arctic +16
    64
    Why this score
    SourceWinterforce 2Grabber Arctic
    Reviews found online3762
  2. 63

    Wet

    Grabber Arctic +8
    71
    Why this score
    SourceWinterforce 2Grabber Arctic
    Reviews found online6171
  3. 73

    Snow

    Grabber Arctic +2
    75
    Why this score
    SourceWinterforce 2Grabber Arctic
    Reviews found online7579
  4. 58

    Comfort

    Grabber Arctic +10
    68
    Why this score
    SourceWinterforce 2Grabber Arctic
    Reviews found online4767
  5. 58

    Noise

    Grabber Arctic +7
    65
    Why this score
    SourceWinterforce 2Grabber Arctic
    Reviews found online4563
  6. 59

    Treadwear

    Grabber Arctic +8
    67
    Why this score
    SourceWinterforce 2Grabber Arctic
    Reviews found online5469
  7. 46

    Handling

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWinterforce 2Grabber Arctic
    Reviews found online46–
Scores at a glance
Firestone Winterforce 2 vs General Grabber Arctic: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone Winterforce 2General Grabber Arctic
Relative Score 60 69
Dry 48 64
Wet 63 71
Snow 73 75
Comfort 58 68
Noise 58 65
Treadwear 59 67
Handling 46 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Recomputed
Headline score

Winterforce 2

Grabber Arctic

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryWinterforce 2Grabber ArcticΔBoth?
Overall Ranking Overall 0% #16/15 · 2022 Consumer Reports Winter Tires 57% #4/8 · 2022 Consumer Reports Winter/Snow Truck/SUV Tires −57.1 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Winterforce 2

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and capability in deep snow
  • Highly competitive price point
  • Reliable performance for daily winter commuting

Cons

  • Increased road noise compared to all-season tires
  • Noticeable 'mushy' or soft handling feedback on dry pavement
  • Limited performance on ice without studs
All owner themes in the Winterforce 2 review

Tire B Grabber Arctic

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and handling in snow and slush
  • Great value and affordable price point compared to premium competitors
  • Reliable cold-weather performance on wet and icy surfaces

Cons

  • Moderate road noise when studded or on dry/slightly wet pavement
  • Average performance on hard-packed ice unless studded
  • Directional/rotational tread pattern may limit tire rotation options for some drivers
All owner themes in the Grabber Arctic review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Winterforce 2 B · General Grabber Arctic
CategoryWinter Premium Touring tiresWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available316
Rim diameters14″ – 18″16″ – 20″
Tread depth12/32″12/32″
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Winterforce 2

General Grabber Arctic

Winner: General Grabber Arctic — better dry, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber Arctic scores 64 vs 48 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

General Grabber Arctic scores 68 vs 58 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

General Grabber Arctic scores 71 vs 63 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

General Grabber Arctic scores 67 vs 59 on treadwear.

Tire A · Firestone Winterforce 2
Tire B · General Grabber Arctic

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

69

Leads

Grabber Arctic

Amazon