tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Winterforce 2 vs General Grabber Arctic — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 28 + 18 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber Arctic is ahead, 71–61

Check price on Amazon · Grabber Arctic or Winterforce 2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Winterforce 2
Tire AFirestone

Winterforce 2

Winter Premium Touring tires

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 28 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 50

    Dry

    Grabber Arctic +16
    66
    Why this score
    SourceWinterforce 2Grabber Arctic
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 57 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online4165

    Winterforce 2: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 40.8 = 50

    Grabber Arctic: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 66

    No road tests of dry for Winterforce 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Grabber Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 65

    Wet

    Grabber Arctic +9
    74
    Why this score
    SourceWinterforce 2Grabber Arctic
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6375

    Winterforce 2: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65

    Grabber Arctic: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Winterforce 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Grabber Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 74

    Snow

    Grabber Arctic +3
    77
    Why this score
    SourceWinterforce 2Grabber Arctic
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online7782

    Winterforce 2: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 74

    Grabber Arctic: 60% × 74 (est.) + 40% × 81.6 = 77

    No road tests of snow for Winterforce 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Grabber Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 51

    Comfort

    Grabber Arctic +17
    68
    Why this score
    SourceWinterforce 2Grabber Arctic
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online4367

    Winterforce 2: 40% × 63.5 (est.) + 60% × 43.1 = 51

    Grabber Arctic: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 67.1 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Winterforce 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 58

    Noise

    Grabber Arctic +8
    66
    Why this score
    SourceWinterforce 2Grabber Arctic
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4665

    Winterforce 2: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 58

    Grabber Arctic: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66

    No road tests of noise for Winterforce 2 or Grabber Arctic. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 59

    Treadwear

    Grabber Arctic +11
    70
    Why this score
    SourceWinterforce 2Grabber Arctic
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5472

    Winterforce 2: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 59

    Grabber Arctic: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Winterforce 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 49

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWinterforce 2Grabber Arctic
    Reviews found online49–
Scores at a glance
CategoryFirestone Winterforce 2General Grabber Arctic
Relative Score 61 71
Dry 50 66
Wet 65 74
Snow 74 77
Comfort 51 68
Noise 58 66
Treadwear 59 70
Handling (owners) 49 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Winterforce 2

± 7

Grabber Arctic

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryWinterforce 2Grabber ArcticΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #16/15 2022 Consumer Reports Winter Tires #4/8 2022 Consumer Reports Winter/Snow Truck/SUV Tires – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Winterforce 2

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and capability in deep snow
  • Highly competitive price point
  • Reliable performance for daily winter commuting

Cons

  • Increased road noise compared to all-season tires
  • Noticeable 'mushy' or soft handling feedback on dry pavement
  • Limited performance on ice without studs
All owner themes in the Winterforce 2 review

Tire B Grabber Arctic

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and handling in snow and slush
  • Great value and affordable price point compared to premium competitors
  • Reliable cold-weather performance on wet and icy surfaces

Cons

  • Moderate road noise when studded or on dry/slightly wet pavement
  • Average performance on hard-packed ice unless studded
  • Directional/rotational tread pattern may limit tire rotation options for some drivers
All owner themes in the Grabber Arctic review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Winterforce 2 B · General Grabber Arctic
CategoryWinter Premium Touring tiresWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available318
Rim diameters14″ – 18″16″ – 20″
Tread depth12/32″12/32″
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi51 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Winterforce 2

General Grabber Arctic

Winner: General Grabber Arctic — better comfort, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. General Grabber Arctic rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 18 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

General Grabber Arctic scores 68 vs 51 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber Arctic scores 66 vs 50 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

General Grabber Arctic scores 70 vs 59 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

General Grabber Arctic scores 74 vs 65 on wet.

Tire A · Firestone Winterforce 2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · General Grabber Arctic
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Winterforce 2 or Grabber Arctic?

Which is better in the wet, Winterforce 2 or Grabber Arctic?

General Grabber Arctic, 74 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Winterforce 2 or Grabber Arctic?

General Grabber Arctic, 66 vs 50 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Winterforce 2 or Grabber Arctic?

General Grabber Arctic, 77 vs 74 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Winterforce 2 or Grabber Arctic?

General Grabber Arctic, 66 vs 58 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Winterforce 2 or Grabber Arctic?

General Grabber Arctic, 68 vs 51 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Winterforce 2 or Grabber Arctic?

General Grabber Arctic, 70 vs 59 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology