Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 10 reviews
Firestone Winterhawk 2 EVO vs Michelin CrossClimate — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 10 + 152 owner reviews. How we score
CrossClimate is ahead, 74–59
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 75 · 2 tests Owners 74 · 152 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 14 in 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test (noise)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
58
Dry
CrossClimate +1876Why this score
Source Winterhawk 2 EVO CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 78 Reviews found online 52 74 Winterhawk 2 EVO: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 58
CrossClimate: 60% × 77.9 + 40% × 73.5 = 76
No road tests of dry for Winterhawk 2 EVO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
60
Wet
CrossClimate +1676Why this score
Source Winterhawk 2 EVO CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 56 78 Winterhawk 2 EVO: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 60
CrossClimate: 60% × 75.4 + 40% × 77.8 = 76
No road tests of wet for Winterhawk 2 EVO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
60
Snow
CrossClimate +969Why this score
Source Winterhawk 2 EVO CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 53 66 Winterhawk 2 EVO: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 60
CrossClimate: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 65.5 = 69
No road tests of snow for Winterhawk 2 EVO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
57
Comfort
CrossClimate +1774Why this score
Source Winterhawk 2 EVO CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 51 76 Winterhawk 2 EVO: 40% × 65.2 (est.) + 60% × 51.1 = 57
CrossClimate: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74
No road tests of comfort for Winterhawk 2 EVO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for CrossClimate. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison69Why this score
Source Winterhawk 2 EVO CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 71 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) CrossClimate: 60% × 70.7 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 69
No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
63
Treadwear
CrossClimate +1174Why this score
Source Winterhawk 2 EVO CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 60 75 Winterhawk 2 EVO: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 63
CrossClimate: 60% × 73.8 + 40% × 74.9 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for Winterhawk 2 EVO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
48
Handling (owners)
CrossClimate +2573Why this score
Source Winterhawk 2 EVO CrossClimate Reviews found online 48 73 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison76Why this score
Source Winterhawk 2 EVO CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 76
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Winterhawk 2 EVO | Michelin CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 59 | 74 |
| Dry | 58 | 76 |
| Wet | 60 | 76 |
| Snow | 60 | 69 |
| Comfort | 57 | 74 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 48 | 73 |
| Efficiency | – | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Winterhawk 2 EVO
CrossClimate
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Winterhawk 2 EVO | CrossClimate | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #28/48 2014 50 Winter Tyre Braking Overview | #9/9 2018 ADAC All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Winterhawk 2 EVO
Pros
- Excellent tread life and durability
- Strong performance on snow and icy surfaces
- High value for the price point
Cons
- Unpredictable grip on wet and damp roads
- Tendency for wheel spin during acceleration in wet conditions
- Inconsistent reports regarding road noise levels
Tire B CrossClimate
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Strong wet-weather grip and hydroplaning resistance
- Reliable traction in light snow and cold conditions
Cons
- Tendency to pick up and retain small stones in the tread pattern
- Noticeable drop in performance as tread depth decreases
- Potential for reduced fuel economy compared to dedicated summer tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Winterhawk 2 EVO | B · Michelin CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | — |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 15″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone Winterhawk 2 EVO
Michelin CrossClimate
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Firestone Winterhawk 2 EVO rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin CrossClimate scores 73 vs 48 on handling.
Michelin CrossClimate scores 76 vs 58 on dry.
Michelin CrossClimate scores 74 vs 57 on comfort.
Michelin CrossClimate scores 76 vs 60 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Winterhawk 2 EVO or CrossClimate?
Which is better in the wet, Winterhawk 2 EVO or CrossClimate?
Michelin CrossClimate, 76 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Winterhawk 2 EVO or CrossClimate?
Michelin CrossClimate, 76 vs 58 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Winterhawk 2 EVO or CrossClimate?
Michelin CrossClimate, 69 vs 60 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Winterhawk 2 EVO or CrossClimate?
Michelin CrossClimate, 74 vs 57 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Winterhawk 2 EVO or CrossClimate?
Michelin CrossClimate, 74 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology