Tests 64 · 1 test Owners 70 · 31 reviews
General Altimax Arctic 12 vs Continental VancoFourSeason — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 31 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners – · 1 review (needs 5)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
51
Dry
No comparison–Why this score
Source Altimax Arctic 12 VancoFourSeason Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 48 – Reviews found online 56 – Altimax Arctic 12: 60% × 47.8 + 40% × 55.6 = 51
-
69
Wet
No comparison–Why this score
Source Altimax Arctic 12 VancoFourSeason Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 65 – Reviews found online 75 – Altimax Arctic 12: 60% × 65.2 + 40% × 75 = 69
-
77
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Altimax Arctic 12 VancoFourSeason Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 74 – Reviews found online 81 – Altimax Arctic 12: 60% × 74 + 40% × 81.1 = 77
-
65
Comfort
No comparison–Why this score
Source Altimax Arctic 12 VancoFourSeason Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 68 – Reviews found online 64 – Altimax Arctic 12: 40% × 68.5 + 60% × 63.5 = 65
-
69
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Altimax Arctic 12 VancoFourSeason Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 73 – Reviews found online 64 – Altimax Arctic 12: 60% × 72.5 + 40% × 63.5 = 69
-
70
Treadwear
No comparison–Why this score
Source Altimax Arctic 12 VancoFourSeason Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) – Reviews found online 73 – Altimax Arctic 12: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Altimax Arctic 12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
67
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Altimax Arctic 12 VancoFourSeason Reviews found online 67 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Altimax Arctic 12 | Continental VancoFourSeason |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | – |
| Dry | 51 | – |
| Wet | 69 | – |
| Snow | 77 | – |
| Comfort | 65 | – |
| Noise | 69 | – |
| Treadwear | 70 | – |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Altimax Arctic 12
VancoFourSeason
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Altimax Arctic 12
Pros
- Outstanding grip and traction in heavy snow, slush, and ice
- Excellent value and affordable price point compared to premium winter tires
- Impressive tread life and long-term durability across multiple winter seasons
Cons
- Noticeable road noise, which can increase as the tires wear
- Slightly soft, squishy, or vague handling characteristics on dry pavement
- Higher rolling resistance resulting in a minor decrease in fuel economy
Tire B VancoFourSeason
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Altimax Arctic 12 | B · Continental VancoFourSeason |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring Winter tire | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 38 | 6 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | 15″ – 17″ |
| Tread depth | 12/32″ | 11 - 15/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 280 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 - 90 psi |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Which one should you actually buy?
General Altimax Arctic 12
Continental VancoFourSeason
Only General Altimax Arctic 12 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology