Head-to-head Updated

General G-MAX RS vs Nexen N2000 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 567 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: G-MAX RS 69, N2000 68.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General G-MAX RS
Tire AGeneral

G-MAX RS

Summer tire

± 7

Tests – · 1 test Owners 59 · 567 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“G-max rs I put 7k miles on these tires and this is the front how many miles would you say I have before problems occur I plan on replacing in a few weeks Read more”

Nexen N2000
Tire BNexen

N2000

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 14 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    G-MAX RS +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceG-MAX RSN2000
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6967

    G-MAX RS: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68

    N2000: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67

    No road tests of dry for G-MAX RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for N2000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    G-MAX RS +1
    70
    Why this score
    SourceG-MAX RSN2000
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7270

    G-MAX RS: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 71

    N2000: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 70

    No road tests of wet for G-MAX RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for N2000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 35

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceG-MAX RSN2000
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 51 (est.)–
    Reviews found online10–

    G-MAX RS: 60% × 51.3 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 35

    No road tests of snow for G-MAX RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    N2000 +2
    66
    Why this score
    SourceG-MAX RSN2000
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6265

    G-MAX RS: 40% × 67.2 (est.) + 60% × 61.6 = 64

    N2000: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.2 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for G-MAX RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for N2000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 62

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceG-MAX RSN2000
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online54–

    G-MAX RS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.2 = 62

    No road tests of noise for G-MAX RS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    G-MAX RS +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceG-MAX RSN2000
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests73≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6570

    G-MAX RS: 60% × 73.4 + 40% × 64.7 = 70

    N2000: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for N2000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 63

    Handling (owners)

    Level
    63
    Why this score
    SourceG-MAX RSN2000
    Reviews found online6363
Scores at a glance
General G-MAX RS vs Nexen N2000: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral G-MAX RSNexen N2000
Relative Score 69 68
Dry 68 67
Wet 71 70
Snow 35 –
Comfort 64 66
Noise 62 –
Treadwear 70 69
Handling (owners) 63 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

G-MAX RS

± 8

N2000

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A G-MAX RS

Pros

  • Outstanding price-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
  • Strong dry and wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality for a performance tire

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can lead to some squirm or less crisp steering response during hard cornering
  • Prone to temporary flat-spotting or vibration when sitting overnight in cooler weather
  • Unpredictable or slippery performance if driven in cold temperatures below 45 degrees Fahrenheit
All owner themes in the G-MAX RS review

Tire B N2000

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money
  • Strong dry road grip and handling feedback
  • Surprisingly durable tread life for many users

Cons

  • Significant decline in wet-weather traction as tread depth decreases
  • Increased road noise and harsh ride quality reported by some users
  • Potential for uneven wear patterns if not properly maintained
All owner themes in the N2000 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

General G-MAX RS

Positive

Community sentiment toward the General G-MAX RS is broadly positive, with users frequently praising its exceptional value and strong dry and wet traction as a budget-friendly ultra-high-performance summer tire. While often favorably compared against premium alternatives like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S or Firestone Indy 500, some owners note compromises including elevated road noise and occasional handling inconsistencies on specific sports car platforms.

Top themes
#value and pricing#dry and wet grip#comparison to Michelin PS4S#comparison to Indy 500#road noise levels#treadwear and longevity#Porsche and Corvette fitment

Based on 53 community posts

Tire B

Nexen N2000

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General G-MAX RS B · Nexen N2000
CategorySummer tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available48—
Rim diameters16″ – 20″—
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG360 - 700 A - AA A340 - 440 A - AA A
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

General G-MAX RS

Nexen N2000

Too close to call: General G-MAX RS and Nexen N2000 are within 2 points overall. Nexen N2000 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Tire A · General G-MAX RS
Tire B · Nexen N2000

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

G-MAX RS or N2000?

Which is better in the wet, G-MAX RS or N2000?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 70 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, G-MAX RS or N2000?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 67 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, G-MAX RS or N2000?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, G-MAX RS or N2000?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology