Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber Arctic vs Firestone Winterforce 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Grabber Arctic is ahead, 69–60

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AGeneral

Grabber Arctic

Winter

Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 18 reviews

Best test result: #4 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports Winter/Snow Truck/SUV Tires (overall ranking)

Tire BFirestone

Winterforce 2

Winter Premium Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 28 reviews

Best test result: #16 of 15 in 2022 Consumer Reports Winter Tires (overall ranking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    Grabber Arctic +16
    48
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticWinterforce 2
    Reviews found online6237
  2. 71

    Wet

    Grabber Arctic +8
    63
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticWinterforce 2
    Reviews found online7161
  3. 75

    Snow

    Grabber Arctic +2
    73
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticWinterforce 2
    Reviews found online7975
  4. 68

    Comfort

    Grabber Arctic +10
    58
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticWinterforce 2
    Reviews found online6747
  5. 65

    Noise

    Grabber Arctic +7
    58
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticWinterforce 2
    Reviews found online6345
  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Grabber Arctic +8
    59
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticWinterforce 2
    Reviews found online6954
  7. –

    Handling

    No comparison
    46
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticWinterforce 2
    Reviews found online–46
Scores at a glance
General Grabber Arctic vs Firestone Winterforce 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral Grabber ArcticFirestone Winterforce 2
Relative Score 69 60
Dry 64 48
Wet 71 63
Snow 75 73
Comfort 68 58
Noise 65 58
Treadwear 67 59
Handling – 46

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Recomputed
Headline score

Grabber Arctic

Winterforce 2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryGrabber ArcticWinterforce 2ΔBoth?
Overall Ranking Overall 57% #4/8 · 2022 Consumer Reports Winter/Snow Truck/SUV Tires 0% #16/15 · 2022 Consumer Reports Winter Tires +57.1 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber Arctic

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and handling in snow and slush
  • Great value and affordable price point compared to premium competitors
  • Reliable cold-weather performance on wet and icy surfaces

Cons

  • Moderate road noise when studded or on dry/slightly wet pavement
  • Average performance on hard-packed ice unless studded
  • Directional/rotational tread pattern may limit tire rotation options for some drivers
All owner themes in the Grabber Arctic review

Tire B Winterforce 2

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and capability in deep snow
  • Highly competitive price point
  • Reliable performance for daily winter commuting

Cons

  • Increased road noise compared to all-season tires
  • Noticeable 'mushy' or soft handling feedback on dry pavement
  • Limited performance on ice without studs
All owner themes in the Winterforce 2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber Arctic B · Firestone Winterforce 2
CategoryWinterWinter Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available631
Rim diameters16″ – 20″14″ – 18″
Tread depth12/32″12/32″
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber Arctic

Firestone Winterforce 2

Winner: General Grabber Arctic — better dry, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber Arctic scores 64 vs 48 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

General Grabber Arctic scores 68 vs 58 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

General Grabber Arctic scores 71 vs 63 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

General Grabber Arctic scores 67 vs 59 on treadwear.

Tire A · General Grabber Arctic
Tire B · Firestone Winterforce 2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

69

Leads

Grabber Arctic

Amazon