Tests – · none yet Owners 76 · 3 reviews
General Snow Grabber+ vs BFGoodrich A/T KO2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Snow Grabber+ is ahead, 73–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 7 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Snow Grabber+ +1459Why this score
Source Snow Grabber+ A/T KO2 Reviews found online 76 55 -
76
Wet
Snow Grabber+ +1759Why this score
Source Snow Grabber+ A/T KO2 Reviews found online 78 55 -
75
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Snow Grabber+ A/T KO2 Reviews found online 79 – -
70
Comfort
Snow Grabber+ +1060Why this score
Source Snow Grabber+ A/T KO2 Reviews found online 71 51 -
71
Treadwear
Snow Grabber+ +863Why this score
Source Snow Grabber+ A/T KO2 Reviews found online 75 61 -
76
Handling
Snow Grabber+ +2947Why this score
Source Snow Grabber+ A/T KO2 Reviews found online 76 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Snow Grabber+ | BFGoodrich A/T KO2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 58 |
| Dry | 73 | 59 |
| Wet | 76 | 59 |
| Snow | 75 | – |
| Comfort | 70 | 60 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 63 |
| Handling | 76 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Snow Grabber+
A/T KO2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Snow Grabber+
Pros
- Excellent traction and capability in deep snow
- Strong grip on both wet and dry road surfaces
- Maintains rubber flexibility over multiple winter seasons
Cons
- Noticeable increase in road noise
- Negative impact on fuel economy
- Lower initial tread depth compared to some competitors
Tire B A/T KO2
Pros
- Exceptional durability and long tread life, holding up well over years and extreme temperatures
- Strong off-road performance in mud, rocks, and sand with reliable sidewall strength when aired down
- Aggressive, appealing visual styling ('badass' look)
Cons
- Increased road noise during daily city driving
- Less than optimal comfort on-road
- Compromised performance and grip in wet on-road conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Snow Grabber+ | B · BFGoodrich A/T KO2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
General Snow Grabber+
BFGoodrich A/T KO2
Winner: General Snow Grabber+ — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
General Snow Grabber+ scores 76 vs 47 on handling.
General Snow Grabber+ scores 76 vs 59 on wet.
General Snow Grabber+ scores 73 vs 59 on dry.
General Snow Grabber+ scores 70 vs 60 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.