Hankook Optimo H725 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Assurance All-Season vs Hankook Optimo H725 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 49 + 36 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Assurance All-Season 56, Optimo H725 55.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Optimo H725
Tire BHankook

Optimo H725

All-Season tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 36 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 57

    Dry

    Assurance All-Season +4
    53
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance All-SeasonOptimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online5245

    Assurance All-Season: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57

    Optimo H725: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53

    No road tests of dry for Assurance All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 58

    Wet

    Assurance All-Season +1
    57
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance All-SeasonOptimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online5452

    Assurance All-Season: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 54.2 = 58

    Optimo H725: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Assurance All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 51

    Snow

    Optimo H725 +4
    55
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance All-SeasonOptimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online3846

    Assurance All-Season: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 37.6 = 51

    Optimo H725: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55

    No road tests of snow for Assurance All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 60

    Comfort

    Assurance All-Season +6
    54
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance All-SeasonOptimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online5140

    Assurance All-Season: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 60

    Optimo H725: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 54

    No road tests of comfort for Assurance All-Season or Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    Assurance All-Season +3
    61
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance All-SeasonOptimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5952

    Assurance All-Season: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.1 = 64

    Optimo H725: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61

    No road tests of noise for Assurance All-Season or Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 53

    Treadwear

    Optimo H725 +3
    56
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance All-SeasonOptimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online4449

    Assurance All-Season: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 44 = 53

    Optimo H725: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56

    No road tests of treadwear for Assurance All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 48

    Handling (owners)

    Assurance All-Season +2
    46
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance All-SeasonOptimo H725
    Reviews found online4846
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Assurance All-Season vs Hankook Optimo H725: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Assurance All-SeasonHankook Optimo H725
Relative Score 56 55
Dry 57 53
Wet 58 57
Snow 51 55
Comfort 60 54
Noise 64 61
Treadwear 53 56
Handling (owners) 48 46

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Assurance All-Season

Optimo H725

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Assurance All-Season

Pros

  • High level of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Excellent value for the price point
  • Reliable dry and wet weather traction for non-aggressive drivers

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear well before the warranty limit
  • Poor performance in winter conditions, specifically on ice and deep snow
  • Occasional reports of vibration and balance issues immediately after installation
All owner themes in the Assurance All-Season review

Tire B Optimo H725

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Assurance All-Season B · Hankook Optimo H725
CategoryAll-Season tireAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available51—
Rim diameters14″ – 20″—
Tread depth9/32″9/32″
UTQG600 A B700 A B
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Assurance All-Season

Hankook Optimo H725

Too close to call: Goodyear Assurance All-Season and Hankook Optimo H725 are within 2 points overall. Goodyear Assurance All-Season is stronger on comfort, dry and noise. Hankook Optimo H725 is stronger on snow and treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Assurance All-Season scores 60 vs 54 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Assurance All-Season scores 57 vs 53 on dry.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Optimo H725 scores 55 vs 51 on snow.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Goodyear Assurance All-Season scores 64 vs 61 on noise.

Tire A · Goodyear Assurance All-Season
Tire B · Hankook Optimo H725

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Assurance All-Season or Optimo H725?

Which is better in the wet, Assurance All-Season or Optimo H725?

Neither, by our numbers: 58 vs 57 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Assurance All-Season or Optimo H725?

Goodyear Assurance All-Season, 57 vs 53 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Assurance All-Season or Optimo H725?

Hankook Optimo H725, 55 vs 51 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Assurance All-Season or Optimo H725?

Goodyear Assurance All-Season, 64 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Assurance All-Season or Optimo H725?

Goodyear Assurance All-Season, 60 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Assurance All-Season or Optimo H725?

Hankook Optimo H725, 56 vs 53 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology