Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 49 reviews
Hankook Optimo H725 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Goodyear Assurance All-Season vs Hankook Optimo H725 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 49 + 36 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Assurance All-Season 56, Optimo H725 55.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 36 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
57
Dry
Assurance All-Season +453Why this score
Source Assurance All-Season Optimo H725 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 52 45 Assurance All-Season: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57
Optimo H725: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53
No road tests of dry for Assurance All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
58
Wet
Assurance All-Season +157Why this score
Source Assurance All-Season Optimo H725 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 54 52 Assurance All-Season: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 54.2 = 58
Optimo H725: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 57
No road tests of wet for Assurance All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
51
Snow
Optimo H725 +455Why this score
Source Assurance All-Season Optimo H725 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 38 46 Assurance All-Season: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 37.6 = 51
Optimo H725: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55
No road tests of snow for Assurance All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
60
Comfort
Assurance All-Season +654Why this score
Source Assurance All-Season Optimo H725 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 51 40 Assurance All-Season: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 60
Optimo H725: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 54
No road tests of comfort for Assurance All-Season or Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Noise
Assurance All-Season +361Why this score
Source Assurance All-Season Optimo H725 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 59 52 Assurance All-Season: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.1 = 64
Optimo H725: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61
No road tests of noise for Assurance All-Season or Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
53
Treadwear
Optimo H725 +356Why this score
Source Assurance All-Season Optimo H725 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 44 49 Assurance All-Season: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 44 = 53
Optimo H725: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56
No road tests of treadwear for Assurance All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
48
Handling (owners)
Assurance All-Season +246Why this score
Source Assurance All-Season Optimo H725 Reviews found online 48 46
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Assurance All-Season | Hankook Optimo H725 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 55 |
| Dry | 57 | 53 |
| Wet | 58 | 57 |
| Snow | 51 | 55 |
| Comfort | 60 | 54 |
| Noise | 64 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 56 |
| Handling (owners) | 48 | 46 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Assurance All-Season
Optimo H725
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Assurance All-Season
Pros
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Excellent value for the price point
- Reliable dry and wet weather traction for non-aggressive drivers
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear well before the warranty limit
- Poor performance in winter conditions, specifically on ice and deep snow
- Occasional reports of vibration and balance issues immediately after installation
Tire B Optimo H725
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Assurance All-Season | B · Hankook Optimo H725 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 51 | — |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 600 A B | 700 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear Assurance All-Season
Hankook Optimo H725
Too close to call: Goodyear Assurance All-Season and Hankook Optimo H725 are within 2 points overall. Goodyear Assurance All-Season is stronger on comfort, dry and noise. Hankook Optimo H725 is stronger on snow and treadwear.
Goodyear Assurance All-Season scores 60 vs 54 on comfort.
Goodyear Assurance All-Season scores 57 vs 53 on dry.
Hankook Optimo H725 scores 55 vs 51 on snow.
Goodyear Assurance All-Season scores 64 vs 61 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Assurance All-Season or Optimo H725?
Which is better in the wet, Assurance All-Season or Optimo H725?
Neither, by our numbers: 58 vs 57 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Assurance All-Season or Optimo H725?
Goodyear Assurance All-Season, 57 vs 53 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Assurance All-Season or Optimo H725?
Hankook Optimo H725, 55 vs 51 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Assurance All-Season or Optimo H725?
Goodyear Assurance All-Season, 64 vs 61 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Assurance All-Season or Optimo H725?
Goodyear Assurance All-Season, 60 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Assurance All-Season or Optimo H725?
Hankook Optimo H725, 56 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology