Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring vs Falken Azenis FK510 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire BFalken

Azenis FK510

Summer

Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 67 · 905 reviews

“Faulken azenis fk510 tires Anyone running these , I’ve ordered a set of wheels and tires from steeda, unfortunately they do not have any nitto n555 g2 tires available i the sizes ive requested “nothing close infact to get a complete set” ive checked all the distributors thru my job and websites. They have however come up with a set of these 275/35/19 fronts and 305/30/19 rears , in comparison the rears will sit approximately 1/2 lower then fronts which will eliminate some rake with the car. Does anyone have experience with these tires? Money wise ill save like 200$ though money is not a factor as oppse to my car came with 235”s and they have to go.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    74
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance ComforTred TouringAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)–72
    Reviews found online–76
  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    83
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance ComforTred TouringAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)–87
    Reviews found online–77
  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    55
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance ComforTred TouringAzenis FK510
    Reviews found online–45
  4. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    52
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance ComforTred TouringAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)–42
    Reviews found online–68
  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    68
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance ComforTred TouringAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)–68
    Reviews found online–68
  6. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    66
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance ComforTred TouringAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)–72
    Reviews found online–57
  7. –

    Handling

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance ComforTred TouringAzenis FK510
    Reviews found online–71
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring vs Falken Azenis FK510: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Assurance ComforTred TouringFalken Azenis FK510
Relative Score – 70
Dry – 74
Wet – 83
Snow – 55
Comfort – 52
Noise – 68
Treadwear – 66
Handling – 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Assurance ComforTred Touring

Azenis FK510

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Assurance ComforTred Touring

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Azenis FK510

Pros

  • Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
  • Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
All owner themes in the Azenis FK510 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.

Top themes
#Wet weather grip#Value and pricing#Treadwear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness and handling#Autocross and track performance

Based on 25 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring B · Falken Azenis FK510
CategoryTouring All Season tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—93
Rim diameters—17″ – 22″
Tread depth11 - 12/32″10/32″
UTQG640 - 740 A B300 A A
SidewallVertical Serrated BandBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring

Falken Azenis FK510

Only Falken Azenis FK510 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring
Tire B · Falken Azenis FK510

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.