Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · none yet
Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring vs Falken Azenis FK510 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 67 · 905 reviews
“Faulken azenis fk510 tires Anyone running these , I’ve ordered a set of wheels and tires from steeda, unfortunately they do not have any nitto n555 g2 tires available i the sizes ive requested “nothing close infact to get a complete set” ive checked all the distributors thru my job and websites. They have however come up with a set of these 275/35/19 fronts and 305/30/19 rears , in comparison the rears will sit approximately 1/2 lower then fronts which will eliminate some rake with the car. Does anyone have experience with these tires? Money wise ill save like 200$ though money is not a factor as oppse to my car came with 235”s and they have to go.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison74Why this score
Source Assurance ComforTred Touring Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) – 72 Reviews found online – 76 -
–
Wet
No comparison83Why this score
Source Assurance ComforTred Touring Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) – 87 Reviews found online – 77 -
–
Snow
No comparison55Why this score
Source Assurance ComforTred Touring Azenis FK510 Reviews found online – 45 -
–
Comfort
No comparison52Why this score
Source Assurance ComforTred Touring Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) – 42 Reviews found online – 68 -
–
Noise
No comparison68Why this score
Source Assurance ComforTred Touring Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) – 68 Reviews found online – 68 -
–
Treadwear
No comparison66Why this score
Source Assurance ComforTred Touring Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) – 72 Reviews found online – 57 -
–
Handling
No comparison71Why this score
Source Assurance ComforTred Touring Azenis FK510 Reviews found online – 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring | Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 70 |
| Dry | – | 74 |
| Wet | – | 83 |
| Snow | – | 55 |
| Comfort | – | 52 |
| Noise | – | 68 |
| Treadwear | – | 66 |
| Handling | – | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Assurance ComforTred Touring
Azenis FK510
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Assurance ComforTred Touring
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Azenis FK510
Pros
- Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
- Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
- Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Falken Azenis FK510
Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.
“Funny, I just had this conversation in r/ecoboostmustang . I was in this exact boat when I first started out autocrossing. I got on 200 TW for 2020 but continued to HPDE on the daily summer tires. Indy 500 - Spring 2019 to Winter 2020 - These take an INCREDIBLE amount of abuse for the money. 30+ autocrosses, 2 HPDEs, 18,000 miles G-Max RS - Fall 2020 to Summer 2021 - Only bummer is they're directional, you technically shouldn't rotate. 10 HPDEs, 15,000 miles Falken FK510 - Spring 2020 to Summer 2020 - HARD NO from me. I corded a set in 10,000 miles between daily & 6 HPDEs.”
“The Falken Azenis FK510 would be my choice of what you have listed, not that either the Conti or Nitto is a bad tire... but on my Corvette I had Nexen N'Fera SU1 and absolutely loved them and drove rather... aggressively.”
“Got a full set of FK510 for my model 3 and I luv em, the low profile really shows off the red performance calibers.”
Based on 25 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring | B · Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Touring All Season tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 93 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 11 - 12/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 - 740 A B | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | Vertical Serrated Band | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring
Falken Azenis FK510
Only Falken Azenis FK510 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.