Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max vs Kumho Solus TA31 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 55 + 79 owner reviews. How we score

Assurance Fuel Max leads, 62–59 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus TA31
Tire BKumho

Solus TA31

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 79 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 62

    Dry

    Assurance Fuel Max +3
    59
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance Fuel MaxSolus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online5954

    Assurance Fuel Max: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.1 = 62

    Solus TA31: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 59

    No road tests of dry for Assurance Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 63

    Wet

    Assurance Fuel Max +1
    62
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance Fuel MaxSolus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6059

    Assurance Fuel Max: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 63

    Solus TA31: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 62

    No road tests of wet for Assurance Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 60

    Snow

    Assurance Fuel Max +4
    56
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance Fuel MaxSolus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5247

    Assurance Fuel Max: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.2 = 60

    Solus TA31: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 46.6 = 56

    No road tests of snow for Assurance Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 57

    Comfort

    Solus TA31 +4
    61
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance Fuel MaxSolus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5158

    Assurance Fuel Max: 40% × 65.2 (est.) + 60% × 51.3 = 57

    Solus TA31: 40% × 66.4 (est.) + 60% × 57.5 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for Assurance Fuel Max or Solus TA31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    Level
    64
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance Fuel MaxSolus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6161

    Assurance Fuel Max: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 64

    Solus TA31: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Assurance Fuel Max or Solus TA31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Assurance Fuel Max +6
    59
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance Fuel MaxSolus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6454

    Assurance Fuel Max: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 63.7 = 65

    Solus TA31: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 59

    No road tests of treadwear for Assurance Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 56

    Handling (owners)

    Assurance Fuel Max +2
    54
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance Fuel MaxSolus TA31
    Reviews found online5654
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max vs Kumho Solus TA31: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Assurance Fuel MaxKumho Solus TA31
Relative Score 62 59
Dry 62 59
Wet 63 62
Snow 60 56
Comfort 57 61
Noise 64 64
Treadwear 65 59
Handling (owners) 56 54

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Assurance Fuel Max

± 7

Solus TA31

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Assurance Fuel Max

Pros

  • Noticeable improvement in fuel economy / MPG
  • Reliable wet and dry traction and handling
  • Impressive long-term tread life and longevity

Cons

  • Some road noise on specific asphalt surfaces
  • Fuel savings may be less noticeable at higher highway speeds over 75 mph
  • Soft rubber compound can be vulnerable to sharp winter cinders or road debris
All owner themes in the Assurance Fuel Max review

Tire B Solus TA31

Pros

  • Exceptional value and budget-friendly pricing
  • Very low road noise and a comfortable, smooth ride
  • Good dry and wet traction for everyday commuting

Cons

  • Poor performance in snow and ice conditions
  • Soft sidewalls leading to reduced high-speed stability and less sharp handling
  • Inconsistent tread wear reported by some users, leading to premature replacement
All owner themes in the Solus TA31 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max B · Kumho Solus TA31
CategoryAll Season Touring tiresAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available722
Rim diameters15″ – 18″15″ – 20″
Tread depth9 - 10/32″9.5/32″
UTQG580 - 620 A A - B500 A A
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi60,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Vertical Serrated BandBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi44 psi
Sizes in common44

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max

Kumho Solus TA31

Narrow edge: Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max — better treadwear, snow and dry. Pick the Kumho Solus TA31 if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max scores 65 vs 59 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max scores 60 vs 56 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Solus TA31 scores 61 vs 57 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max scores 62 vs 59 on dry.

Tire A · Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max
Tire B · Kumho Solus TA31

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Assurance Fuel Max or Solus TA31?

Which is better in the wet, Assurance Fuel Max or Solus TA31?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 62 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Assurance Fuel Max or Solus TA31?

Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max, 62 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Assurance Fuel Max or Solus TA31?

Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max, 60 vs 56 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Assurance Fuel Max or Solus TA31?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 64 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Assurance Fuel Max or Solus TA31?

Kumho Solus TA31, 61 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Assurance Fuel Max or Solus TA31?

Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max, 65 vs 59 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology