Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 17 + 31 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle F1 Sport leads, 73–71 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Advan Neova AD08 +1
    75
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 SportAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7780

    Eagle F1 Sport: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 74

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 75

    Wet

    Eagle F1 Sport +6
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 SportAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7769

    Eagle F1 Sport: 60% × 74.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 75

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 SportAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–61

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Sport +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 SportAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7267

    Eagle F1 Sport: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 70

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Sport or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 SportAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–68

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Eagle F1 Sport +3
    63
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 SportAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6661

    Eagle F1 Sport: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 66

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 77

    Handling (owners)

    Advan Neova AD08 +2
    79
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 SportAdvan Neova AD08
    Reviews found online7779
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Eagle F1 SportYokohama Advan Neova AD08
Relative Score 73 71
Dry 74 75
Wet 75 69
Snow – 65
Comfort 70 68
Noise – 67
Treadwear 66 63
Handling (owners) 77 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Eagle F1 Sport

Advan Neova AD08

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle F1 Sport

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip with high cornering confidence
  • High level of comfort and plush ride quality for a sporty tire
  • Sharp steering response and improved handling

Cons

  • Potential for aquaplaning in heavy downpours
  • Some reports of rapid outer tread wear or durability issues under harsh driving
  • Softer sidewalls can sometimes reduce direct steering feedback
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Sport review

Tire B Advan Neova AD08

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip and cornering traction
  • Exceptional steering feedback and crisp response
  • Stiff, robust sidewall and carcass construction

Cons

  • Prone to overheating and rubber degradation/chunking during heavy track use
  • Reduced performance and aquaplaning tendencies in heavy standing water
  • Limited size availability for larger rims
All owner themes in the Advan Neova AD08 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—180 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

Narrow edge: Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport — better wet and treadwear. Where the Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport scores 75 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport scores 66 vs 63 on treadwear.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Eagle F1 Sport or Advan Neova AD08?

Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Sport or Advan Neova AD08?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport, 75 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Sport or Advan Neova AD08?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Sport or Advan Neova AD08?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Sport or Advan Neova AD08?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport, 66 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology