Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 1,727 reviews
“Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance SUV are summer tires, not all season tires, I believe.”
Hankook Optimo H725 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 1,727 + 36 owner reviews. How we score
EfficientGrip is ahead, 61–55
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 1,727 reviews
“Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance SUV are summer tires, not all season tires, I believe.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 36 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | EfficientGrip | Optimo H725 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 62 (est.) | ≈ 58 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 54 | 45 |
EfficientGrip: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.4 = 59
Optimo H725: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53
No road tests of dry for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | EfficientGrip | Optimo H725 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 65 (est.) | ≈ 60 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 62 | 52 |
EfficientGrip: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.7 = 64
Optimo H725: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 57
No road tests of wet for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | EfficientGrip | Optimo H725 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 62 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 46 |
EfficientGrip: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 67
Optimo H725: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55
No road tests of snow for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
| Source | EfficientGrip | Optimo H725 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 56 | 40 |
EfficientGrip: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 63
Optimo H725: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 54
No road tests of comfort for EfficientGrip or Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | EfficientGrip | Optimo H725 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 45 | 52 |
EfficientGrip: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 58
Optimo H725: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61
No road tests of noise for EfficientGrip or Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | EfficientGrip | Optimo H725 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 63 (est.) | ≈ 60 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 56 | 49 |
EfficientGrip: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 60
Optimo H725: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56
No road tests of treadwear for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | EfficientGrip | Optimo H725 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 50 | 46 |
| Category | Goodyear EfficientGrip | Hankook Optimo H725 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 55 |
| Dry | 59 | 53 |
| Wet | 64 | 57 |
| Snow | 67 | 55 |
| Comfort | 63 | 54 |
| Noise | 58 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 56 |
| Handling (owners) | 50 | 46 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
EfficientGrip
Optimo H725
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community opinion on the Goodyear EfficientGrip family is mixed, with users frequently praising its high tread life, comfort, and solid wet braking compared to rivals. However, several drivers express concerns regarding soft sidewalls prone to pothole damage, vague handling dynamics during spirited driving, and disappointing cold or wet traction when used out of season. Many discussions also center on comparing it against alternative touring tires like Michelin Primacy and Continental PremiumContact.
“Hi Llew! Currently running Pirelli Cinturato P7 Run Flats. I don't do a lot of long-distance driving anymore, so I am fine with not having a sporty feel, but I wouldn't mind trying that out, being new to BMWs. So the Khumos apparently are a better fit for that. I ran the three 3 choices (Khumo, GY, Pirelli) through chat for a comparison, and it spat out that the Goodyear EfficientGrip is a very "compelling" tyre and the better choice. Not sure what to make of that.”
“Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance SUV are summer tires, not all season tires, I believe.”
“Hankook ventus prime 4 VS Goodyear efficientgrip performance 2 I cannot decide between these two tires for ages now. Customer reviews seem all over the place. I drive a tuned volkswagen polo mk6 2020. I need something that inspires confidence for spirited driving in corners with good stability, mainly dry handling and braking but also relatively comfortable. So far I've learned that the goodyear is more comfortable, better in the wet, better at braking but extremely lousy in handling because of the soft sidewalls. Can someone that has used the EGP2 confirm those claims or are they exaggerating. Base spec polos are known for a harsh ride and I live in the balkans. The roads are full of potholes and sometimes you can't even drive around them. specs: 195/55R16 87V”
Based on 21 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Goodyear EfficientGrip | B · Hankook Optimo H725 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 24 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 340 A A | 700 A B |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
Goodyear EfficientGrip
Hankook Optimo H725
Winner: Goodyear EfficientGrip — better snow, comfort and wet. Pick the Hankook Optimo H725 if noise matters most to you.
Goodyear EfficientGrip scores 67 vs 55 on snow.
Goodyear EfficientGrip scores 63 vs 54 on comfort.
Goodyear EfficientGrip scores 64 vs 57 on wet.
Goodyear EfficientGrip scores 59 vs 53 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Goodyear EfficientGrip, 64 vs 57 on our wet score.
Goodyear EfficientGrip, 59 vs 53 on our dry score.
Goodyear EfficientGrip, 67 vs 55 on our snow score.
Hankook Optimo H725, 61 vs 58 on our noise score.
Goodyear EfficientGrip, 63 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Goodyear EfficientGrip, 60 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology