Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 1,727 reviews
“Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance SUV are summer tires, not all season tires, I believe.”
Head-to-head
Updated
Goodyear EfficientGrip vs Michelin Primacy HP — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 1,727 + 204 owner reviews. How we score
Primacy HP is ahead, 64–59
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 204 reviews
“I have these tires on my 2013 GL550 and they handle really well here in Chicago. They are a little loud for me, but do great in the snow and rain.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
58
Dry
Primacy HP +765Why this score
Source EfficientGrip Primacy HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 53 63 EfficientGrip: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 53.3 = 58
Primacy HP: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65
No road tests of dry for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Primacy HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
63
Wet
Primacy HP +265Why this score
Source EfficientGrip Primacy HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 60 63 EfficientGrip: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 63
Primacy HP: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 65
No road tests of wet for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Primacy HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source EfficientGrip Primacy HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) – Reviews found online 65 – EfficientGrip: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 67
No road tests of snow for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
59
Comfort
Primacy HP +362Why this score
Source EfficientGrip Primacy HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 54 59 EfficientGrip: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 54 = 59
Primacy HP: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 58.9 = 62
No road tests of comfort for EfficientGrip or Primacy HP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
57
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source EfficientGrip Primacy HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 42 – EfficientGrip: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 42 = 57
No road tests of noise for EfficientGrip. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
58
Treadwear
Primacy HP +563Why this score
Source EfficientGrip Primacy HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 53 61 EfficientGrip: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 53.1 = 58
Primacy HP: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Primacy HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
47
Handling (owners)
Primacy HP +1360Why this score
Source EfficientGrip Primacy HP Reviews found online 47 60
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear EfficientGrip | Michelin Primacy HP |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 59 | 64 |
| Dry | 58 | 65 |
| Wet | 63 | 65 |
| Snow | 67 | – |
| Comfort | 59 | 62 |
| Noise | 57 | – |
| Treadwear | 58 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 47 | 60 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
59
/ 100
EfficientGrip
64
/ 100
Primacy HP
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | EfficientGrip | Primacy HP | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #7/14 2012 ACE Touring Summer Tyre Test | #5/6 2010 Autocar Tyre Test - FWD | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A EfficientGrip
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
- Good fuel economy and rolling resistance
- Reliable wet and dry grip for everyday driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls result in a mushy or 'jelly-like' steering feel during cornering
- Vulnerability to sidewall damage, bulges, and punctures from road hazards
- Faster-than-expected tread wear for some users
Tire B Primacy HP
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and longevity
- Strong dry-road grip and handling
- High fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
Cons
- Noticeable decline in wet-weather grip as tread depth decreases
- High retail price compared to competitors
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Goodyear EfficientGrip
Community opinion on the Goodyear EfficientGrip family is mixed, with users frequently praising its high tread life, comfort, and solid wet braking compared to rivals. However, several drivers express concerns regarding soft sidewalls prone to pothole damage, vague handling dynamics during spirited driving, and disappointing cold or wet traction when used out of season. Many discussions also center on comparing it against alternative touring tires like Michelin Primacy and Continental PremiumContact.
r/ex30
·3 upvotes ·2025-10-29
“Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance SUV are summer tires, not all season tires, I believe.”
bmwfanatics.co.za
·2025-11-20
“Hi Llew! Currently running Pirelli Cinturato P7 Run Flats. I don't do a lot of long-distance driving anymore, so I am fine with not having a sporty feel, but I wouldn't mind trying that out, being new to BMWs. So the Khumos apparently are a better fit for that. I ran the three 3 choices (Khumo, GY, Pirelli) through chat for a comparison, and it spat out that the Goodyear EfficientGrip is a very "compelling" tyre and the better choice. Not sure what to make of that.”
r/srbija_automobili
·9 upvotes ·2026-07-10
“Nov KUMHO ecsta sport ps 72 ili minimalno korišćen GOODYEAR efficientgrip 2? Pozdrav, molim za savet ko je imao iskustva sa ovim modelima guma. Trebaju mi letnje gume za Mazda 3 2.0 benzin 150 KS (na sport oprugama) i imam dve ponude: Nove Kumho ecsta sport ps 72 ili (pouzdano znam) 2000km korišćene Goodyear Efficientgrip performance 2 sa DOT 0726. Cena je bukvalno ista, godišnje prelazim oko 6k, volim da vozim dinamično kada može. Za Kumho sam čitao da je skoro predstavljena i da je solidna dok sam za Goodyear čitao da je za udobnu vožnju bez dinamike. Da li suštinski ta "sport" razlika može da se oseti u povremenoj dinamičnoj vožnji toliko pa da ima smisla odustati od povoljne odlične premium gume? Read more”
Top themes
#tread life and longevity#soft sidewall damage#wet and winter grip#comfort vs sporty handling#summer touring tire comparisons#tread cracking and chipping
Based on 21 community posts
Tire B
Mixed
Michelin Primacy HP
Community opinion on the Michelin Primacy HP is divided depending on use case: enthusiasts frequently criticize them for lacking grip compared to dedicated Pilot Sport performance tires, though many appreciate their playful, low-traction slide characteristics on cars like the GR86/BRZ. Owners also note their low rolling resistance and suitability for mild climates, but raise occasional discussions around shoulder cracking with age and their limitation as summer-only rubber.
gr86.org
·2024-11-11
“So long as you’ve got some tread, the stock Primacy HP tires are plenty safe for Bay Area weather all year ‘round. Just don’t drive anywhere that gets real winter weather or freezing temps. I’d avoid trips up to Tahoe in January. And don’t climb Mt. Diablo or Mt. Hamilton when they get their occasional dusting of snow. (I live in upstate NY now, so I’m familiar with tires & winter conditions …but I’m also a Bay Area native.)”
g42.bimmerpost.com
“BIMMERPOST / Classifieds Asking Price: USD 30.00 Location: ✓ Local Pickup Only Item Interest These tires were removed from my F10 535i M Sport with 15k miles on them. They have 3/32nd (30%) of tread depth remaining. They are great for those of you looking to do some burnouts or donuts. Both tires have not been patched. I am asking $30 local pick up only in SoCal 91765.”
mbworld.org
“I have these tires on my 2013 GL550 and they handle really well here in Chicago. They are a little loud for me, but do great in the snow and rain.”
Top themes
#grip vs playfulness#comparison to pilot sport#summer tire limitations#tread cracking concerns#low rolling resistance#oem fitment discussion
Based on 36 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear EfficientGrip | B · Michelin Primacy HP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 24 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 17″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 340 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
59
/ 100
Goodyear EfficientGrip
64
/ 100
Michelin Primacy HP
Winner: Michelin Primacy HP — better handling, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Primacy HP scores 60 vs 47 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Primacy HP scores 65 vs 58 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Primacy HP scores 63 vs 58 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Primacy HP scores 62 vs 59 on comfort.
Tire A · Goodyear EfficientGrip
Tire B · Michelin Primacy HP
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
EfficientGrip or Primacy HP?
Which is better in the wet, EfficientGrip or Primacy HP?
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 65 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, EfficientGrip or Primacy HP?
Michelin Primacy HP, 65 vs 58 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, EfficientGrip or Primacy HP?
Michelin Primacy HP, 62 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, EfficientGrip or Primacy HP?
Michelin Primacy HP, 63 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology