Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Fortera HL Edition vs Laufenn I FIT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Fortera HL Edition is ahead, 64–51

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire BLaufenn

I FIT

Winter

Tests 49 · 1 test Owners 46 · 7 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Fortera HL Edition +15
    50
    Why this score
    SourceFortera HL EditionI FIT
    Reviews found online6440
  2. 68

    Wet

    Fortera HL Edition +26
    42
    Why this score
    SourceFortera HL EditionI FIT
    Professional tests (TWG score)–49
    Reviews found online6833
  3. 60

    Snow

    I FIT +4
    64
    Why this score
    SourceFortera HL EditionI FIT
    Reviews found online5460
  4. 65

    Comfort

    Fortera HL Edition +3
    62
    Why this score
    SourceFortera HL EditionI FIT
    Reviews found online6055
  5. 64

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFortera HL EditionI FIT
    Reviews found online59–
  6. 61

    Treadwear

    Fortera HL Edition +3
    58
    Why this score
    SourceFortera HL EditionI FIT
    Reviews found online5853
  7. 64

    Handling

    Fortera HL Edition +26
    38
    Why this score
    SourceFortera HL EditionI FIT
    Reviews found online6438
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Fortera HL Edition vs Laufenn I FIT: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Fortera HL EditionLaufenn I FIT
Relative Score 64 51
Dry 65 50
Wet 68 42
Snow 60 64
Comfort 65 62
Noise 64 –
Treadwear 61 58
Handling 64 38

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Fortera HL Edition

I FIT

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Fortera HL Edition

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B I FIT

Pros

  • Acceptable traction in snow and ice conditions
  • Comfortable and quiet ride quality when new
  • Affordable budget-oriented pricing as a Hankook sub-brand

Cons

  • Catastrophically poor grip and high risk of aquaplaning on wet and cold roads
  • Sudden loss of traction without warning, inspiring low confidence
  • Rapid performance degradation after the first or second season
All owner themes in the I FIT review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Fortera HL Edition B · Laufenn I FIT
Category—Winter
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—4
Rim diameters—14″ – 18″

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Fortera HL Edition

Laufenn I FIT

Winner: Goodyear Fortera HL Edition — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Laufenn I FIT if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Fortera HL Edition scores 68 vs 42 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear Fortera HL Edition scores 64 vs 38 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Fortera HL Edition scores 65 vs 50 on dry.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Laufenn I FIT scores 64 vs 60 on snow.

Tire A · Goodyear Fortera HL Edition
Tire B · Laufenn I FIT

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

64

Leads

Fortera HL Edition

Amazon