Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 31 reviews
Goodyear Wrangler Fortitude HT vs Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Agilis CrossClimate is ahead, 76–64
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 2 tests Owners 81 · 1,066 reviews
“Anyone tried Michelin Agilis CrossClimate tires on a Bolt? Following the info from I have picked up some used 15" Sonic wheels for winter use here in Maine. I can get Michelin Ice snow tires in an equivalent 15" size (to match the circumference of the stock tire/wheel) but not Cross Climate 2s. However, this Agilis is available in a near equivalent. It appears to be a heavier tire designed primarily for delivery vans Google AI suggests it has a slightly higher rolling resistance to the CC2s, which many report to have about a 10% hit on range - although any new tire will be less efficient than a well-worn one, so we should take that info with a grain of salt The Michelin Energy Saver tires are obviously more efficient, but also rated poor for use in snow. I'm a bit torn between "proper" snow tires and the Agilis, which I could run all year round One other factor is that smaller wheels tend to be more efficient - to a noticeable extent on EVs, so it just might be a wash as far as efficiency goes Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Agilis CrossClimate +1377Why this score
Source Wrangler Fortitude HT Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) – 71 Reviews found online 62 85 -
63
Wet
Agilis CrossClimate +1477Why this score
Source Wrangler Fortitude HT Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) – 71 Reviews found online 61 84 -
66
Snow
Agilis CrossClimate +1076Why this score
Source Wrangler Fortitude HT Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) – 75 Reviews found online 63 79 -
66
Comfort
Agilis CrossClimate +874Why this score
Source Wrangler Fortitude HT Agilis CrossClimate Reviews found online 63 79 -
67
Noise
Agilis CrossClimate +774Why this score
Source Wrangler Fortitude HT Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) – 73 Reviews found online 67 76 -
64
Treadwear
Agilis CrossClimate +872Why this score
Source Wrangler Fortitude HT Agilis CrossClimate Reviews found online 62 77 -
63
Handling
Agilis CrossClimate +1780Why this score
Source Wrangler Fortitude HT Agilis CrossClimate Reviews found online 63 80
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Wrangler Fortitude HT | Michelin Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 76 |
| Dry | 64 | 77 |
| Wet | 63 | 77 |
| Snow | 66 | 76 |
| Comfort | 66 | 74 |
| Noise | 67 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 72 |
| Handling | 63 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Wrangler Fortitude HT
Agilis CrossClimate
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Wrangler Fortitude HT
Pros
- Excellent tread life and durability
- Quiet and smooth highway ride quality
- Improved fuel economy compared to all-terrain alternatives
Cons
- Poor traction in snow, ice, and heavy rain
- Inadequate performance for off-road or mud environments
- Reports of vibration and balancing issues in some units
Tire B Agilis CrossClimate
Pros
- Outstanding wet and winter weather traction
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Stiff sidewalls providing enhanced cornering stability and handling
Cons
- Slightly higher road noise or low drone at certain speeds
- Higher initial purchase price compared to standard options
- A few reports of a minor decrease in fuel economy
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Goodyear Wrangler Fortitude HT
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Community sentiment toward the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate is largely positive, with owners of vans, RVs, and heavy-duty trucks praising its wet and snow traction, quiet ride, and capability under heavy loads. However, discussions frequently highlight trade-offs such as faster tread wear compared to the Defender series and concerns regarding an NHTSA recall on certain C-metric sizes for snow traction marking non-compliance. Prospective buyers also note confusion regarding the differing directional C-metric and non-directional LT-metric designs.
“Agilis Crossclimate vs Agilis LTX as a summer tire for a pickup? Daily driver Chevy 3/4 ton pickup. I've got a set of winter tires that I run from Nov-Mar but I need to replace my summer tires. Mediterranean climate, so dry summers. 99% of my driving is city/highway, maybe 1-5 days per year on dry dirt roads. I'd like to go with the crossclimate since they're about $200 cheaper for the set. I guess the Defender LTX just got rebranded Agilis LTX. I know the Defender LTX is a very popular light truck tire. Y'all think I can get away with the crossclimate and save a couple hundred bucks? Read more”
“I spoke with Michelin technical support this morning. The company has not conducted any testing on this tire on 1/2 ton trucks or full-size SUVs. I opted to bypass the tire and purchased Michelin Defender LTX M/S in LT285/70R17. I had high hopes of getting inproved winter weather performance for the few snow days in my area each year, but it wasn't worth the gamble for potentially a low mileage & costly tire.”
“Lapland - Tyre Advice - Michelin Agilis Crossclimate Grateful for the knowledge/experience of the good people of r/Finland . I ordinarily use studded tyres for my van, but planning a roadtrip down to Germany/France over the new year (so can't fit these). I've no experience with friction tyres on snow/ice, but have Michelin Agilis Crossclimate [ . These have the 3PMSF marking so I understand are technically legal in Finland for winter, but I'm not sure about safety/performance in Lapland (route being: Tornio, to Sweden and then down via Denmark.) Good to hear people's views, or if you've experience with these types of tyres in this environment? UPDATE: Really appreciate the comments and views put forward on this. By the debate it seems I’m not alone in being not clear about winter performance of a tyre rated 3PMSF but not a “true” Nordic friction tyre. It does not make economic sense to buy new winter friction tyres for a road trip. So thinking about packing the Michelins, driving the studded tyre and getting them swapped/stored in Denmark or South Sweden and then swapping back on return. A pain in ass, a waste of space but the least risky approach. If anyone’s done similar let me know your experience.”
Based on 54 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Wrangler Fortitude HT | B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring All Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Van |
| Sizes available | 9 | 22 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 15″ – 17″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 15/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 680 A B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 83 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear Wrangler Fortitude HT
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Winner: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 80 vs 63 on handling.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 77 vs 63 on wet.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 77 vs 64 on dry.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 76 vs 66 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.