Tests – · none yet Owners – · 3 reviews (needs 5)
Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 is discontinued — replaced by Hankook Dynapro HT RH12. Compare Dynapro HT RH12 with Agilis CrossClimate
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 vs Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 3 + 1,068 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 2 tests Owners 86 · 1,068 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2020 Commercial Van All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)
“We have the Agilis cross climates on our C-class 3.5t MH and have been utterly delighted with them. They’re quiet, really grippy and give a great ride. What’s not to like?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison78Why this score
Source Dynapro AS RH03 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 72 Reviews found online – 88 Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 71.5 + 40% × 87.6 = 78
-
–
Wet
No comparison78Why this score
Source Dynapro AS RH03 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 71 Reviews found online – 88 Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 71.4 + 40% × 88.1 = 78
-
–
Snow
No comparison78Why this score
Source Dynapro AS RH03 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 75 Reviews found online – 82 Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 75 + 40% × 82.1 = 78
-
–
Comfort
No comparison78Why this score
Source Dynapro AS RH03 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online – 82 Agilis CrossClimate: 40% × 71.5 (est.) + 60% × 81.8 = 78
No road tests of comfort for Agilis CrossClimate. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison70Why this score
Source Dynapro AS RH03 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 73 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 73 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 70
No owner ratings of noise for Agilis CrossClimate. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
–
Treadwear
No comparison78Why this score
Source Dynapro AS RH03 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online – 85 Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 85 = 78
No road tests of treadwear for Agilis CrossClimate. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison81Why this score
Source Dynapro AS RH03 Agilis CrossClimate Reviews found online – 81 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison69Why this score
Source Dynapro AS RH03 Agilis CrossClimate Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 | Michelin Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 78 |
| Dry | – | 78 |
| Wet | – | 78 |
| Snow | – | 78 |
| Comfort | – | 78 |
| Noise | – | 70 |
| Treadwear | – | 78 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 81 |
| Efficiency | – | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
–
/ 100
Dynapro AS RH03
78
/ 100
Agilis CrossClimate
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro AS RH03
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Agilis CrossClimate
Pros
- Outstanding wet and winter weather traction
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Stiff sidewalls providing enhanced cornering stability and handling
Cons
- Slightly higher road noise or low drone at certain speeds
- Higher initial purchase price compared to standard options
- A few reports of a minor decrease in fuel economy
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Hankook Dynapro AS RH03
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Community sentiment toward the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate is largely positive, with owners of vans, RVs, and heavy-duty trucks praising its wet and snow traction, quiet ride, and capability under heavy loads. However, discussions frequently highlight trade-offs such as faster tread wear compared to the Defender series and concerns regarding an NHTSA recall on certain C-metric sizes for snow traction marking non-compliance. Prospective buyers also note confusion regarding the differing directional C-metric and non-directional LT-metric designs.
vwcaliforniaclub.com
·5 upvotes ·2024-07-02
“I fitted these to our 680 Michelin Agilis Crossclimate 235/60 R17C 117/115R 8PR, 3PMSF And they work well, better off tarmac (Grassy muddy farm track) than the factory tyres and felt better in heavy rain. I can’t recall if ride quality changed tho.”
r/tires
·2 upvotes ·2026-10-05
“Costco tire employee here- It can be hard to estimate tire life w/out warranty info. Most members see about 60k miles on the agilis crossclimate and 75k on the defender ltx. The agilis is the better tire for heavy loading but you have to balance that against how fast you'll wear them out. Both are great tires though”
f150forum.com
“I bought a set of Agilis for my 2017 F250 King Ranch two years ago. I live in Colorado and I was attracted to the idea that they could possibly be left on year round and not have to swap between summer and winter tires. I have swapped between summer and winter tires for the past 25 years here in Colorado and I have tried tires that were supposedly "ALL SEASON" but they were always a compromise, not great in the summer and as a highway tire and not great in the winter as a snow or ice tire. The Agilis has been the only tire that has great summer performance, quiet and nice handling and also it has been hard to believe, but they act pretty close to Blizzaks I've had in the past for winter driving. I have 25,000 miles on them and they are wearing very well, and have not become noisy. I'm surprised there are not more accolades on these tires. They came out on top vs several other all season tires.”
Top themes
#Heavy load capability#Winter and snow traction#Tread wear longevity#Defender LTX comparison#C-metric recall notice#Ride comfort and noise#Van and RV use
Based on 54 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 | B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Van |
| Sizes available | — | 22 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 17″ |
| Tread depth | 14/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 80 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
–
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro AS RH03
78
/ 100
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Only Michelin Agilis CrossClimate has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro AS RH03
Tire B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology