Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 3 reviews
Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 is discontinued — replaced by Hankook Dynapro HT RH12. Compare Dynapro HT RH12 with Crugen HT51
Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 vs Kumho Crugen HT51 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 3 + 164 owner reviews. How we score
Crugen HT51 is ahead, 72–57
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 75 · 164 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
56
Dry
Crugen HT51 +1773Why this score
Source Dynapro AS RH03 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 49 77 Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56
Crugen HT51: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 73
No road tests of dry for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
57
Wet
Crugen HT51 +1875Why this score
Source Dynapro AS RH03 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 53 77 Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 57
Crugen HT51: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 75
No road tests of wet for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
55
Snow
Crugen HT51 +1570Why this score
Source Dynapro AS RH03 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 45 70 Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 44.8 = 55
Crugen HT51: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 70
No road tests of snow for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
59
Comfort
Crugen HT51 +1271Why this score
Source Dynapro AS RH03 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 48 72 Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 48.3 = 59
Crugen HT51: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Noise
Crugen HT51 +1172Why this score
Source Dynapro AS RH03 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 51 78 Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 61
Crugen HT51: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.3 = 72
No road tests of noise for Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
60
Treadwear
Crugen HT51 +464Why this score
Source Dynapro AS RH03 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 58 Reviews found online 56 74 Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 60
Crugen HT51: 60% × 57.7 + 40% × 74.1 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
49
Handling (owners)
Crugen HT51 +2675Why this score
Source Dynapro AS RH03 Crugen HT51 Reviews found online 49 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 | Kumho Crugen HT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 57 | 72 |
| Dry | 56 | 73 |
| Wet | 57 | 75 |
| Snow | 55 | 70 |
| Comfort | 59 | 71 |
| Noise | 61 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 49 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Dynapro AS RH03
Crugen HT51
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro AS RH03
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Crugen HT51
Pros
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
- Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
- Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction
Cons
- Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
- Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
- Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 | B · Kumho Crugen HT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 44 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 14/32″ | 12.5/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 720 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 80 psi | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Dynapro AS RH03
Kumho Crugen HT51
Winner: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 75 vs 49 on handling.
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 75 vs 57 on wet.
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 73 vs 56 on dry.
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 70 vs 55 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HT51?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 75 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 73 vs 56 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 55 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 72 vs 61 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 71 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 64 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology