Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 is discontinued — replaced by Hankook Dynapro HT RH12. Compare Dynapro HT RH12 with Crugen HT51

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 vs Kumho Crugen HT51 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 3 + 164 owner reviews. How we score

Crugen HT51 is ahead, 72–57

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire BKumho

Crugen HT51

All Season

Tests – · 1 test Owners 75 · 164 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 56

    Dry

    Crugen HT51 +17
    73
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AS RH03Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online4977

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 57

    Wet

    Crugen HT51 +18
    75
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AS RH03Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online5377

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 57

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 75

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 55

    Snow

    Crugen HT51 +15
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AS RH03Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online4570

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 44.8 = 55

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 70

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    Crugen HT51 +12
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AS RH03Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online4872

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 48.3 = 59

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 61

    Noise

    Crugen HT51 +11
    72
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AS RH03Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5178

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 61

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.3 = 72

    No road tests of noise for Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 60

    Treadwear

    Crugen HT51 +4
    64
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AS RH03Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 63 (est.)58
    Reviews found online5674

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 60

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 57.7 + 40% × 74.1 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 49

    Handling (owners)

    Crugen HT51 +26
    75
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AS RH03Crugen HT51
    Reviews found online4975
Scores at a glance
Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 vs Kumho Crugen HT51: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Dynapro AS RH03Kumho Crugen HT51
Relative Score 57 72
Dry 56 73
Wet 57 75
Snow 55 70
Comfort 59 71
Noise 61 72
Treadwear 60 64
Handling (owners) 49 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Dynapro AS RH03

Crugen HT51

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro AS RH03

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Crugen HT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
  • Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction

Cons

  • Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
  • Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
  • Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
All owner themes in the Crugen HT51 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 B · Kumho Crugen HT51
CategoryAll-Season tireAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available—44
Rim diameters—15″ – 22″
Tread depth14/32″12.5/32″
UTQG—720 A A
Treadwear warranty—70,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure80 psi50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03

Kumho Crugen HT51

Winner: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 75 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 75 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 73 vs 56 on dry.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 70 vs 55 on snow.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro AS RH03
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HT51

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HT51?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 75 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 73 vs 56 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 55 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 72 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 71 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro AS RH03 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 64 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology