Tests – · 1 test Owners 65 · 910 reviews
“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 vs Kumho Crugen HT51 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 910 + 164 owner reviews. How we score
Crugen HT51 is ahead, 71–65
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 75 · 164 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
Crugen HT51 +673Why this score
Source Dynapro HT RH12 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 67 77 Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67
Crugen HT51: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 73
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
67
Wet
Crugen HT51 +875Why this score
Source Dynapro HT RH12 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 66 77 Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67
Crugen HT51: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 75
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
60
Snow
Crugen HT51 +1070Why this score
Source Dynapro HT RH12 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 53 70 Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 60
Crugen HT51: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 70
No road tests of snow for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
67
Comfort
Crugen HT51 +471Why this score
Source Dynapro HT RH12 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 66 72 Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67
Crugen HT51: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HT RH12 or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Noise
Crugen HT51 +272Why this score
Source Dynapro HT RH12 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 75 78 Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 70
Crugen HT51: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.3 = 72
No road tests of noise for Dynapro HT RH12 or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
Level64Why this score
Source Dynapro HT RH12 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 64 58 Reviews found online 64 74 Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 63% 58% Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 63.9 + 40% × 64 = 64
Crugen HT51: 60% × 57.7 + 40% × 74.1 = 64
-
65
Handling (owners)
Crugen HT51 +1075Why this score
Source Dynapro HT RH12 Crugen HT51 Reviews found online 65 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 | Kumho Crugen HT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 71 |
| Dry | 67 | 73 |
| Wet | 67 | 75 |
| Snow | 60 | 70 |
| Comfort | 67 | 71 |
| Noise | 70 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
Dynapro HT RH12
71
/ 100
Crugen HT51
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 finished ahead 0 times and Kumho Crugen HT51 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | Dynapro HT RH12 | Crugen HT51 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 63% | 58% | +5.3 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires · 215/60R17 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #10/13 | #5/13 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires · 215/60R17 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro HT RH12
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Crugen HT51
Pros
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
- Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
- Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction
Cons
- Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
- Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
- Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Community discussions around the Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 highlight it primarily as a mid-tier, budget-conscious highway all-season option for trucks and SUVs. Drivers appreciate its quiet ride, stable tracking, and solid grip, though some note a slightly jumpy ride quality. Most mentions revolve around purchase pricing, sizing options, and comparisons to alternative all-terrain or highway tires.
f150forum.com
“Quote: Originally Posted by Bamaman This must be one of the most popular size of tires on the retail tire market. We're talking 100's to pick from. And unfortunately it's a very expensive tire size too. Yes I've noticed they are expensive! Although I realize I am not limited to just what is in stock at my nearest DiscTire, what they have now is interesting - not many in stock right now. They range from the $169 Trailfinder All Terrain, the $206.00 Cooper Discovers ATP II, the $209.00 Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, then a big jump up to the $277.00 Michelin Defender LTX M/S, and the YUGE $293.00 BFG A/T T/A KO2. I need a tire pretty much for road driving only. I do not often go out of town but for instance I've got a 9 hour trip later this month. It snows here in my area maybe..2 weeks / year, and nothing insane. So I don't really even need A/T tires in my opinion. The Hankook Dynapro seems to fit budget and looks like a good road tire. I can't tell which ones are Chinese but, sure, I'd love to avoid that too! Thanks for all the suggestions here.”
r/denverlist
·2025-12-09
“For Sale: 3X Used Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 Tire - 205/75R16C Description: 3 used Hankook Dynapro HT (RH12) highway all-season tire is available. This model is designed for vans, pickups, and sport utility vehicles, combining long treadwear, good ride comfort, and all-season traction. Brand: Hankook Model: Dynapro HT (RH12) Size: 205/75R16C Condition: Used/Part-worn. The tire has been previously used. Features: The tire features a high-grip silica compound for improved wet and dry traction and a reinforced under-tread to prevent internal damage from impacts. Price: $300 Location: South Denver, Metro area delivery for $50 Read more”
ridgelineownersclub.com
·2012-10-28
“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Top themes
#pricing and affordability#quiet highway ride#wet and dry traction#tire comparisons#ride comfort and stability
Based on 8 community posts
Tire B
Kumho Crugen HT51
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 | B · Kumho Crugen HT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 24 | 44 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 14/32″ | 12.5/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 720 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 40,000 mi | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 54 psi | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 19 | 19 |
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
71
/ 100
Kumho Crugen HT51
Winner: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better snow, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 70 vs 60 on snow.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 75 vs 65 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 75 vs 67 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 73 vs 67 on dry.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HT51
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro HT RH12 or Crugen HT51?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HT RH12 or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 75 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HT RH12 or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 73 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Dynapro HT RH12 or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 60 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Dynapro HT RH12 or Crugen HT51?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 72 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HT RH12 or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 71 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro HT RH12 or Crugen HT51?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology