Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 910 reviews
“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 vs Kumho Crugen HT51 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 2 road tests and 910 + 164 owner reviews. How we score
Dynapro HT RH12 leads, 67–65 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 55 · 2 tests Owners 75 · 164 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 9 in 2024 Tire Rack Highway All Season Tyre Test (dry circle)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Dynapro HT RH12 +465Why this score
Source Dynapro HT RH12 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 58 Reviews found online 70 76 Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 69
Crugen HT51: 60% × 58.2 + 40% × 75.9 = 65
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
69
Wet
Dynapro HT RH12 +267Why this score
Source Dynapro HT RH12 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 60 Reviews found online 69 78 Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 69
Crugen HT51: 60% × 59.5 + 40% × 78.1 = 67
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
62
Snow
Dynapro HT RH12 +1349Why this score
Source Dynapro HT RH12 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 36 Reviews found online 56 70 Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 55.5 = 62
Crugen HT51: 60% × 35.8 + 40% × 69.7 = 49
No road tests of snow for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
67
Comfort
Crugen HT51 +370Why this score
Source Dynapro HT RH12 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 66 70 Dynapro HT RH12: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 66.4 = 67
Crugen HT51: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 70.4 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
71
Noise
Level71Why this score
Source Dynapro HT RH12 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 77 79 Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 71
Crugen HT51: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 79 = 71
No road tests of noise for Dynapro HT RH12 or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Crugen HT51 +166Why this score
Source Dynapro HT RH12 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 64 58 Reviews found online 66 76 Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 63% 58% Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 64.2 + 40% × 65.8 = 65
Crugen HT51: 60% × 58.4 + 40% × 76.4 = 66
-
67
Handling (owners)
Crugen HT51 +774Why this score
Source Dynapro HT RH12 Crugen HT51 Reviews found online 67 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 | Kumho Crugen HT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 65 |
| Dry | 69 | 65 |
| Wet | 69 | 67 |
| Snow | 62 | 49 |
| Comfort | 67 | 70 |
| Noise | 71 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
67
/ 100
Dynapro HT RH12
65
/ 100
Crugen HT51
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 finished ahead 0 times and Kumho Crugen HT51 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | Dynapro HT RH12 | Crugen HT51 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 63% | 58% | +5.3 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires · 215/60R17 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #10/13 | #5/13 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires · 215/60R17 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro HT RH12
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Crugen HT51
Pros
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
- Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
- Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction
Cons
- Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
- Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
- Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
The community generally views the Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 as a reliable, comfortable highway all-season tire that offers good value compared to premium alternatives. Users note that the tires are quiet, track straight, and provide solid wet and dry grip, making them a popular choice for trucks, SUVs, and daily commuting.
r/denverlist
·2025-12-09
“For Sale: 3X Used Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 Tire - 205/75R16C Description: 3 used Hankook Dynapro HT (RH12) highway all-season tire is available. This model is designed for vans, pickups, and sport utility vehicles, combining long treadwear, good ride comfort, and all-season traction. Brand: Hankook Model: Dynapro HT (RH12) Size: 205/75R16C Condition: Used/Part-worn. The tire has been previously used. Features: The tire features a high-grip silica compound for improved wet and dry traction and a reinforced under-tread to prevent internal damage from impacts. Price: $300 Location: South Denver, Metro area delivery for $50 Read more”
bobistheoilguy.com
·2018-07-14
“4 new Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 now installed in the CRV. Fresh production date (0618) and now made in the US. Thread looks slightly different than the replaced ones. They are quiet, track straight, no balancing issues and have a nice grip. Ride is a bit jumpy, not too much. $550 OTD with a $50 rebate. Son is happy.”
ridgelineownersclub.com
·2012-10-28
“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Top themes
#highway driving comfort#low road noise#good wet and dry grip#competitive pricing#straight line tracking#SUV and truck compatibility#treadwear and longevity
Based on 8 community posts
Tire B
Kumho Crugen HT51
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 | B · Kumho Crugen HT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 24 | 44 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 14/32″ | 12.5/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 720 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 40,000 mi | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 54 psi | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 19 | 19 |
Which one should you actually buy?
67
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
65
/ 100
Kumho Crugen HT51
Narrow edge: Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 — better snow and dry. Pick the Kumho Crugen HT51 if handling and comfort matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 scores 62 vs 49 on snow.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 74 vs 67 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 scores 69 vs 65 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 70 vs 67 on comfort.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HT51
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro HT RH12 or Crugen HT51?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HT RH12 or Crugen HT51?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 67 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HT RH12 or Crugen HT51?
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 69 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Dynapro HT RH12 or Crugen HT51?
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 62 vs 49 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Dynapro HT RH12 or Crugen HT51?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HT RH12 or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro HT RH12 or Crugen HT51?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology