Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 910 reviews
“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 910 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Defender LTX M/S is ahead, 79–67
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 910 reviews
“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Tests – · 1 test Owners 83 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | ≈ 75 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 70 | 84 |
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 69
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 74.7 (est.) + 40% × 84.3 = 79
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 70 (est.) | ≈ 79 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 86 |
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 69
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 78.8 (est.) + 40% × 85.6 = 82
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 72 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 55 | 77 |
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 62
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 74
No road tests of snow for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 78 |
Dynapro HT RH12: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 66.3 = 67
Defender LTX M/S: 40% × 70.5 (est.) + 60% × 77.7 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 77 | – |
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 71
No road tests of noise for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests | 64 | 75 |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 86 |
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 63% | 84% |
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 64.2 + 40% × 65.8 = 65
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 75.4 + 40% × 86.3 = 80
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 67 | 82 |
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 | Michelin Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 79 |
| Dry | 69 | 79 |
| Wet | 69 | 82 |
| Snow | 62 | 74 |
| Comfort | 67 | 75 |
| Noise | 71 | – |
| Treadwear | 65 | 80 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 82 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dynapro HT RH12
Defender LTX M/S
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 finished ahead 0 times and Michelin Defender LTX M/S 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | Dynapro HT RH12 | Defender LTX M/S | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 63% | 84% | −21.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires · 215/60R17 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #10/13 | #3/13 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires · 215/60R17 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community generally views the Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 as a reliable, comfortable highway all-season tire that offers good value compared to premium alternatives. Users note that the tires are quiet, track straight, and provide solid wet and dry grip, making them a popular choice for trucks, SUVs, and daily commuting.
“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
“For Sale: 3X Used Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 Tire - 205/75R16C Description: 3 used Hankook Dynapro HT (RH12) highway all-season tire is available. This model is designed for vans, pickups, and sport utility vehicles, combining long treadwear, good ride comfort, and all-season traction. Brand: Hankook Model: Dynapro HT (RH12) Size: 205/75R16C Condition: Used/Part-worn. The tire has been previously used. Features: The tire features a high-grip silica compound for improved wet and dry traction and a reinforced under-tread to prevent internal damage from impacts. Price: $300 Location: South Denver, Metro area delivery for $50 Read more”
“4 new Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 now installed in the CRV. Fresh production date (0618) and now made in the US. Thread looks slightly different than the replaced ones. They are quiet, track straight, no balancing issues and have a nice grip. Ride is a bit jumpy, not too much. $550 OTD with a $50 rebate. Son is happy.”
Based on 8 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 | B · Michelin Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 24 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 14/32″ | — |
| UTQG | — | 720 - 800 B A |
| Treadwear warranty | 40,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 54 psi | — |
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Michelin Defender LTX M/S
Winner: Michelin Defender LTX M/S — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Defender LTX M/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 80 vs 65 on treadwear.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 82 vs 67 on handling.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 82 vs 69 on wet.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 74 vs 62 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 82 vs 69 on our wet score.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 79 vs 69 on our dry score.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 74 vs 62 on our snow score.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 75 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 80 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology