Hankook Optimo H725 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro HP2 vs Hankook Optimo H725 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 36 owner reviews. How we score

Dynapro HP2 leads, 58–55 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro HP2
Tire AHankook

Dynapro HP2

All-Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 10 reviews

Hankook Optimo H725
Tire BHankook

Optimo H725

All-Season tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 36 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    Dynapro HP2 +6
    53
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2Optimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online5545

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 59

    Optimo H725: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 57

    Wet

    Level
    57
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2Optimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online5352

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 52.7 = 57

    Optimo H725: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 59

    Snow

    Dynapro HP2 +4
    55
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2Optimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online5246

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 51.9 = 59

    Optimo H725: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 60

    Comfort

    Dynapro HP2 +6
    54
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2Optimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online5140

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.5 = 60

    Optimo H725: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 54

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2 or Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 63

    Noise

    Dynapro HP2 +2
    61
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2Optimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5852

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 63

    Optimo H725: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61

    No road tests of noise for Dynapro HP2 or Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    Optimo H725 +2
    56
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2Optimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online4649

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 54

    Optimo H725: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 51

    Handling (owners)

    Dynapro HP2 +5
    46
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2Optimo H725
    Reviews found online5146
Scores at a glance
Hankook Dynapro HP2 vs Hankook Optimo H725: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Dynapro HP2Hankook Optimo H725
Relative Score 58 55
Dry 59 53
Wet 57 57
Snow 59 55
Comfort 60 54
Noise 63 61
Treadwear 54 56
Handling (owners) 51 46

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Dynapro HP2

Optimo H725

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro HP2

Pros

  • Reliable handling and roadability on dry pavement
  • Good fuel economy and low rolling resistance contributing to high MPG
  • Capably handles towing duties on all-wheel-drive vehicles

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear reported by multiple users
  • Poor wet weather performance and dangerous sliding tendencies in rain
  • Inconsistent snow traction, with some users noting a lack of confidence in winter conditions
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP2 review

Tire B Optimo H725

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 B · Hankook Optimo H725
CategoryAll-SeasonAll-Season tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available44—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—700 A B
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro HP2

Hankook Optimo H725

Narrow edge: Hankook Dynapro HP2 — better dry, comfort and snow. Where the Hankook Optimo H725 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Hankook Dynapro HP2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Dynapro HP2 scores 59 vs 53 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Dynapro HP2 scores 60 vs 54 on comfort.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Dynapro HP2 scores 59 vs 55 on snow.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HP2
Tire B · Hankook Optimo H725

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro HP2 or Optimo H725?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP2 or Optimo H725?

Neither, by our numbers: 57 vs 57 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP2 or Optimo H725?

Hankook Dynapro HP2, 59 vs 53 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Dynapro HP2 or Optimo H725?

Hankook Dynapro HP2, 59 vs 55 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Dynapro HP2 or Optimo H725?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 61 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP2 or Optimo H725?

Hankook Dynapro HP2, 60 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP2 or Optimo H725?

Neither, by our numbers: 54 vs 56 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology