Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 49 reviews
Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco vs Kumho Ecowing ES31 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 49 + 9,931 owner reviews. How we score
K425 Kinergy Eco leads, 67–63 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 9,931 reviews
“Certa vez, nos comentários de um vídeo sobre pneus no YouTube, vi a galera que trabalha com Uber falando bem do Ecowing ES31, relatando que tem ótima durabilidade. Resolvi arriscar e coloquei, são ótimos mesmo, já rodei 18 mil km e estão impecáveis ainda.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
K425 Kinergy Eco +364Why this score
Source K425 Kinergy Eco Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 66 62 K425 Kinergy Eco: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 67
Ecowing ES31: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.9 = 64
No road tests of dry for K425 Kinergy Eco. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
70
Wet
K425 Kinergy Eco +763Why this score
Source K425 Kinergy Eco Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 69 60 K425 Kinergy Eco: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 70
Ecowing ES31: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 63
No road tests of wet for K425 Kinergy Eco. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
65
Comfort
K425 Kinergy Eco +263Why this score
Source K425 Kinergy Eco Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 64 61 K425 Kinergy Eco: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 63.9 = 65
Ecowing ES31: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 60.7 = 63
No road tests of comfort for K425 Kinergy Eco or Ecowing ES31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
63
Treadwear
Ecowing ES31 +366Why this score
Source K425 Kinergy Eco Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 60 65 K425 Kinergy Eco: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 63
Ecowing ES31: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for K425 Kinergy Eco. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
65
Handling (owners)
K425 Kinergy Eco +1055Why this score
Source K425 Kinergy Eco Ecowing ES31 Reviews found online 65 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco | Kumho Ecowing ES31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 63 |
| Dry | 67 | 64 |
| Wet | 70 | 63 |
| Comfort | 65 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
K425 Kinergy Eco
Ecowing ES31
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | K425 Kinergy Eco | Ecowing ES31 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/10 2016 ACE Mid Range Summer Tyre Test | #9/18 2022 ADAC 16" SUV Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A K425 Kinergy Eco
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable and stable handling in dry conditions
Cons
- Inconsistent or poor wet-weather traction
- High levels of cabin noise, particularly on coarse asphalt
- Stiff, rigid ride quality
Tire B Ecowing ES31
Pros
- Exceptional value and affordability compared to premium brand alternatives
- Low road noise and enhanced ride comfort over bumps and speed humps
- Improved fuel economy and reduced rolling resistance
Cons
- Polarizing wet weather performance, with some users reporting frightening losses of traction
- Soft sidewalls that can feel vague during quick lane changes or lead to vulnerability against curbs and potholes
- Occasional reports of accelerated or uneven tread wear on outer shoulders
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Kumho Ecowing ES31
The Kumho Ecowing ES31 is generally viewed as an affordable, budget-friendly mid-range summer tire that offers good durability and dry grip, making it popular among commuters and rideshare drivers. However, opinions are mixed regarding its wet weather performance, with some users reporting poor wet grip while others find it acceptable for cautious, everyday driving.
“Kumho ecowing es31 é o melhor custo benefício, tem classificação B de consumo e C de aderência, eu já tive pneu da Kumho e gostei da aderência e é um pneu macio pra conforto. Continental Power Contact 2 tbm é uma boa opção. Eu não recomendo xbri, farroad, ling long, speedmax, pois tem durabilidade baixa.”
“Tengo las kumho ecowing es31 y ninguna queja, siempre respondieron bien aunque la verdad manejo como un abuelo, solo una vez frene fuerte en la panamericana y nunca bloquearon, las volveria a poner en otro auto.”
“The EU label is all over the place. But none have A-A-A as far as I can tell. Did not score good in wet in the test on the site. Wear rate on a Mazda 2 should be decent with almost anything. Why not look at all seasons? Sava All weather and Kumho Solus are closest to the ES31 in price.”
Based on 12 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco | B · Kumho Ecowing ES31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 27 | 39 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 16″ | 13″ – 18″ |
| UTQG | 220 - 400 A A | — |
| Sizes in common | 18 | 18 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco
Kumho Ecowing ES31
Narrow edge: Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Kumho Ecowing ES31 if treadwear matters most to you.
Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco scores 65 vs 55 on handling.
Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco scores 70 vs 63 on wet.
Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco scores 67 vs 64 on dry.
Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 66 vs 63 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
K425 Kinergy Eco or Ecowing ES31?
Which is better in the wet, K425 Kinergy Eco or Ecowing ES31?
Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco, 70 vs 63 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, K425 Kinergy Eco or Ecowing ES31?
Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco, 67 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, K425 Kinergy Eco or Ecowing ES31?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 63 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, K425 Kinergy Eco or Ecowing ES31?
Kumho Ecowing ES31, 66 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology