Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 55 · 1,589 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (noise)
Hankook Optimo H725 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 vs Hankook Optimo H725 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 1,589 + 36 owner reviews. How we score
Kinergy Eco 2 is ahead, 64–55
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 36 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Kinergy Eco 2 +1253Why this score
Source Kinergy Eco 2 Optimo H725 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests 72 ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 55 45 Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 55.4 = 65
Optimo H725: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53
No road tests of dry for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
69
Wet
Kinergy Eco 2 +1257Why this score
Source Kinergy Eco 2 Optimo H725 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests 75 ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 61 52 Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 74.5 + 40% × 60.5 = 69
Optimo H725: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 57
No road tests of wet for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison55Why this score
Source Kinergy Eco 2 Optimo H725 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online – 46 Optimo H725: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55
No road tests of snow for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
61
Comfort
Kinergy Eco 2 +754Why this score
Source Kinergy Eco 2 Optimo H725 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 52 40 Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 61
Optimo H725: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 54
No road tests of comfort for Kinergy Eco 2 or Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
72
Noise
Kinergy Eco 2 +1161Why this score
Source Kinergy Eco 2 Optimo H725 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests 75 ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) 52 Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 72
Optimo H725: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61
No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy Eco 2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
No road tests of noise for Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
57
Treadwear
Kinergy Eco 2 +156Why this score
Source Kinergy Eco 2 Optimo H725 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 51 49 Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51 = 57
Optimo H725: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56
No road tests of treadwear for Kinergy Eco 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
54
Handling (owners)
Kinergy Eco 2 +846Why this score
Source Kinergy Eco 2 Optimo H725 Reviews found online 54 46
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 | Hankook Optimo H725 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 55 |
| Dry | 65 | 53 |
| Wet | 69 | 57 |
| Snow | – | 55 |
| Comfort | 61 | 54 |
| Noise | 72 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 56 |
| Handling (owners) | 54 | 46 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
64
/ 100
Kinergy Eco 2
55
/ 100
Optimo H725
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Kinergy Eco 2
Pros
- Reliable dry and wet road grip
- Good value for the price point
- Slow and even tread wear / long-lasting durability
Cons
- Notable road noise reported by some users
- Stiff ride quality that can amplify road bumps
- Reduced performance and grip in wet or cold conditions as tread wears down
Tire B Optimo H725
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 | B · Hankook Optimo H725 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 48 | — |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 17″ | — |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 700 A B |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
64
/ 100
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
55
/ 100
Hankook Optimo H725
Winner: Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 — better dry, wet and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 65 vs 53 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 69 vs 57 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 72 vs 61 on noise.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 54 vs 46 on handling.
Tire A · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
Tire B · Hankook Optimo H725
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Kinergy Eco 2 or Optimo H725?
Which is better in the wet, Kinergy Eco 2 or Optimo H725?
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2, 69 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Kinergy Eco 2 or Optimo H725?
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2, 65 vs 53 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Kinergy Eco 2 or Optimo H725?
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2, 72 vs 61 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Kinergy Eco 2 or Optimo H725?
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2, 61 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Kinergy Eco 2 or Optimo H725?
Neither, by our numbers: 57 vs 56 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology