Tests – · none yet Owners 25 · 3 reviews
Hankook Optimo H428 vs Kumho Ecsta PA51 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ecsta PA51 is ahead, 68–39
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 165 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
38
Dry
Ecsta PA51 +3068Why this score
Source Optimo H428 Ecsta PA51 Reviews found online 21 68 -
36
Wet
Ecsta PA51 +3268Why this score
Source Optimo H428 Ecsta PA51 Reviews found online 24 67 -
40
Snow
Ecsta PA51 +2262Why this score
Source Optimo H428 Ecsta PA51 Reviews found online 20 57 -
45
Comfort
Ecsta PA51 +2166Why this score
Source Optimo H428 Ecsta PA51 Reviews found online 21 63 -
52
Noise
Ecsta PA51 +1769Why this score
Source Optimo H428 Ecsta PA51 Reviews found online 30 72 -
48
Treadwear
Ecsta PA51 +2371Why this score
Source Optimo H428 Ecsta PA51 Professional tests (TWG score) – 70 Reviews found online 36 72 -
23
Handling
Ecsta PA51 +4366Why this score
Source Optimo H428 Ecsta PA51 Reviews found online 23 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Optimo H428 | Kumho Ecsta PA51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 39 | 68 |
| Dry | 38 | 68 |
| Wet | 36 | 68 |
| Snow | 40 | 62 |
| Comfort | 45 | 66 |
| Noise | 52 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 48 | 71 |
| Handling | 23 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Optimo H428
Ecsta PA51
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Optimo H428
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Ecsta PA51
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Strong dry pavement traction and cornering grip
- Quiet and smooth ride quality
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in heavy rain or standing water
- Some reports of increased road noise over time
- Limited availability in certain niche sizes
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Optimo H428 | B · Kumho Ecsta PA51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 2 | 13 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | 16″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 9.5/32″ | 10.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 500 A A | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 45,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Optimo H428
Kumho Ecsta PA51
Winner: Kumho Ecsta PA51 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 66 vs 23 on handling.
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 68 vs 36 on wet.
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 68 vs 38 on dry.
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 71 vs 48 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.