Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 169 reviews
Hankook Optimo H724 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Optimo H724 vs Laufenn G FIT AS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 169 + 15 owner reviews. How we score
Optimo H724 is ahead, 66–59
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Optimo H724 +660Why this score
Source Optimo H724 G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 66 55 Optimo H724: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66
G FIT AS: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.9 = 60
No road tests of dry for Optimo H724. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
68
Wet
Optimo H724 +1058Why this score
Source Optimo H724 G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 67 53 Optimo H724: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68
G FIT AS: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 58
No road tests of wet for Optimo H724. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
63
Snow
Optimo H724 +459Why this score
Source Optimo H724 G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 58 50 Optimo H724: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.8 = 63
G FIT AS: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 50.4 = 59
No road tests of snow for Optimo H724. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
65
Comfort
Optimo H724 +461Why this score
Source Optimo H724 G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 64 58 Optimo H724: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 64 = 65
G FIT AS: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.8 = 61
No road tests of comfort for Optimo H724 or G FIT AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Optimo H724 G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 69 – Optimo H724: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 67
No road tests of noise for Optimo H724. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
Optimo H724 +1255Why this score
Source Optimo H724 G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 67 47 Optimo H724: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67
G FIT AS: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.4 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H724. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison56Why this score
Source Optimo H724 G FIT AS Reviews found online – 56
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Optimo H724 | Laufenn G FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 59 |
| Dry | 66 | 60 |
| Wet | 68 | 58 |
| Snow | 63 | 59 |
| Comfort | 65 | 61 |
| Noise | 67 | – |
| Treadwear | 67 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 56 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
66
/ 100
Optimo H724
59
/ 100
G FIT AS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Optimo H724
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B G FIT AS
Pros
- Affordable, budget-friendly pricing
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Decent dry pavement grip and handling
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction with frequent wheel spin from a stop
- Inadequate winter and snow performance
- Rapid tread wear or early failure reported by some users
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Optimo H724 | B · Laufenn G FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 500 A B | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
66
/ 100
Hankook Optimo H724
59
/ 100
Laufenn G FIT AS
Winner: Hankook Optimo H724 — better treadwear, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Laufenn G FIT AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 15 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Optimo H724 scores 67 vs 55 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Optimo H724 scores 68 vs 58 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Optimo H724 scores 66 vs 60 on dry.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Hankook Optimo H724 scores 63 vs 59 on snow.
Tire A · Hankook Optimo H724
Tire B · Laufenn G FIT AS
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Optimo H724 or G FIT AS?
Which is better in the wet, Optimo H724 or G FIT AS?
Hankook Optimo H724, 68 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Optimo H724 or G FIT AS?
Hankook Optimo H724, 66 vs 60 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Optimo H724 or G FIT AS?
Hankook Optimo H724, 63 vs 59 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Optimo H724 or G FIT AS?
Hankook Optimo H724, 65 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Optimo H724 or G FIT AS?
Hankook Optimo H724, 67 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology