Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 36 reviews
Hankook Optimo H725 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Optimo H725 vs Kumho Ecsta PA51 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 36 + 165 owner reviews. How we score
Ecsta PA51 is ahead, 67–55
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 165 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
53
Dry
Ecsta PA51 +1568Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Ecsta PA51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 45 68 Optimo H725: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53
Ecsta PA51: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 68
No road tests of dry for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Ecsta PA51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
57
Wet
Ecsta PA51 +1168Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Ecsta PA51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 52 67 Optimo H725: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 57
Ecsta PA51: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68
No road tests of wet for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Ecsta PA51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
55
Snow
Ecsta PA51 +762Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Ecsta PA51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 46 57 Optimo H725: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55
Ecsta PA51: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 56.7 = 62
No road tests of snow for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Ecsta PA51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
54
Comfort
Ecsta PA51 +1266Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Ecsta PA51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 40 63 Optimo H725: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 54
Ecsta PA51: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Optimo H725 or Ecsta PA51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Noise
Ecsta PA51 +869Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Ecsta PA51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 52 73 Optimo H725: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61
Ecsta PA51: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 69
No road tests of noise for Optimo H725 or Ecsta PA51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
56
Treadwear
Ecsta PA51 +1571Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Ecsta PA51 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 49 72 Optimo H725: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56
Ecsta PA51: 60% × 69.8 + 40% × 71.8 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
46
Handling (owners)
Ecsta PA51 +2066Why this score
Source Optimo H725 Ecsta PA51 Reviews found online 46 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Optimo H725 | Kumho Ecsta PA51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 55 | 67 |
| Dry | 53 | 68 |
| Wet | 57 | 68 |
| Snow | 55 | 62 |
| Comfort | 54 | 66 |
| Noise | 61 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 46 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
55
/ 100
Optimo H725
67
/ 100
Ecsta PA51
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Optimo H725
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Ecsta PA51
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Strong dry pavement traction and cornering grip
- Quiet and smooth ride quality
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in heavy rain or standing water
- Some reports of increased road noise over time
- Limited availability in certain niche sizes
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Optimo H725 | B · Kumho Ecsta PA51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 13 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 10.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 700 A B | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 45,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
55
/ 100
Hankook Optimo H725
67
/ 100
Kumho Ecsta PA51
Winner: Kumho Ecsta PA51 — better handling, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 66 vs 46 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 68 vs 53 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 71 vs 56 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 66 vs 54 on comfort.
Tire A · Hankook Optimo H725
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PA51
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Optimo H725 or Ecsta PA51?
Which is better in the wet, Optimo H725 or Ecsta PA51?
Kumho Ecsta PA51, 68 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Optimo H725 or Ecsta PA51?
Kumho Ecsta PA51, 68 vs 53 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Optimo H725 or Ecsta PA51?
Kumho Ecsta PA51, 62 vs 55 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Optimo H725 or Ecsta PA51?
Kumho Ecsta PA51, 69 vs 61 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Optimo H725 or Ecsta PA51?
Kumho Ecsta PA51, 66 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Optimo H725 or Ecsta PA51?
Kumho Ecsta PA51, 71 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology