Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 36 reviews
Hankook Optimo H725 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Optimo H725 vs Laufenn G FIT AS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 36 + 14 owner reviews. How we score
G FIT AS is ahead, 59–54
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
53
Dry
G FIT AS +861Why this score
Source Optimo H725 G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 45 58 Optimo H725: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53
G FIT AS: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 57.5 = 61
No road tests of dry for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
57
Wet
G FIT AS +259Why this score
Source Optimo H725 G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 52 55 Optimo H725: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 57
G FIT AS: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.1 = 59
No road tests of wet for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
55
Snow
G FIT AS +358Why this score
Source Optimo H725 G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 46 51 Optimo H725: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55
G FIT AS: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 58
No road tests of snow for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
54
Comfort
G FIT AS +1064Why this score
Source Optimo H725 G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 40 59 Optimo H725: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 54
G FIT AS: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 64
No road tests of comfort for Optimo H725 or G FIT AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Optimo H725 G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 52 – Optimo H725: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61
No road tests of noise for Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
56
Treadwear
Optimo H725 +155Why this score
Source Optimo H725 G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 49 48 Optimo H725: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56
G FIT AS: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 47.5 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
46
Handling (owners)
G FIT AS +1157Why this score
Source Optimo H725 G FIT AS Reviews found online 46 57
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Optimo H725 | Laufenn G FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 54 | 59 |
| Dry | 53 | 61 |
| Wet | 57 | 59 |
| Snow | 55 | 58 |
| Comfort | 54 | 64 |
| Noise | 61 | – |
| Treadwear | 56 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 46 | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
54
/ 100
Optimo H725
59
/ 100
G FIT AS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Optimo H725
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B G FIT AS
Pros
- Affordable, budget-friendly pricing
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Decent dry pavement grip and handling
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction with frequent wheel spin from a stop
- Inadequate winter and snow performance
- Rapid tread wear or early failure reported by some users
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Optimo H725 | B · Laufenn G FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 700 A B | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
54
/ 100
Hankook Optimo H725
59
/ 100
Laufenn G FIT AS
Winner: Laufenn G FIT AS — better handling, comfort and dry. Where the Hankook Optimo H725 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Laufenn G FIT AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Laufenn G FIT AS scores 57 vs 46 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Laufenn G FIT AS scores 64 vs 54 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Laufenn G FIT AS scores 61 vs 53 on dry.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Laufenn G FIT AS scores 58 vs 55 on snow.
Tire A · Hankook Optimo H725
Tire B · Laufenn G FIT AS
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Optimo H725 or G FIT AS?
Which is better in the wet, Optimo H725 or G FIT AS?
Neither, by our numbers: 57 vs 59 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Optimo H725 or G FIT AS?
Laufenn G FIT AS, 61 vs 53 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Optimo H725 or G FIT AS?
Laufenn G FIT AS, 58 vs 55 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Optimo H725 or G FIT AS?
Laufenn G FIT AS, 64 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Optimo H725 or G FIT AS?
Neither, by our numbers: 56 vs 55 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology