Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 36 reviews
Hankook Optimo H725 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Optimo H725 vs Yokohama AVID ENVigor — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 36 + 72 owner reviews. How we score
AVID ENVigor is ahead, 65–55
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 72 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
53
Dry
AVID ENVigor +1467Why this score
Source Optimo H725 AVID ENVigor Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 45 67 Optimo H725: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53
AVID ENVigor: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 67
No road tests of dry for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for AVID ENVigor. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
57
Wet
AVID ENVigor +1269Why this score
Source Optimo H725 AVID ENVigor Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 52 69 Optimo H725: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 57
AVID ENVigor: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 69
No road tests of wet for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for AVID ENVigor. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
55
Snow
AVID ENVigor +358Why this score
Source Optimo H725 AVID ENVigor Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 46 50 Optimo H725: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55
AVID ENVigor: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 49.9 = 58
No road tests of snow for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for AVID ENVigor. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
54
Comfort
AVID ENVigor +1064Why this score
Source Optimo H725 AVID ENVigor Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 40 60 Optimo H725: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 54
AVID ENVigor: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 64
No road tests of comfort for Optimo H725 or AVID ENVigor. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Noise
AVID ENVigor +566Why this score
Source Optimo H725 AVID ENVigor Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 52 64 Optimo H725: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61
AVID ENVigor: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 66
No road tests of noise for Optimo H725 or AVID ENVigor. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
56
Treadwear
AVID ENVigor +763Why this score
Source Optimo H725 AVID ENVigor Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 49 61 Optimo H725: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56
AVID ENVigor: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for AVID ENVigor. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
46
Handling (owners)
AVID ENVigor +1662Why this score
Source Optimo H725 AVID ENVigor Reviews found online 46 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Optimo H725 | Yokohama AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 55 | 65 |
| Dry | 53 | 67 |
| Wet | 57 | 69 |
| Snow | 55 | 58 |
| Comfort | 54 | 64 |
| Noise | 61 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 46 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
55
/ 100
Optimo H725
65
/ 100
AVID ENVigor
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Optimo H725
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B AVID ENVigor
Pros
- Smooth and exceptionally quiet ride comfort
- Great value and competitive pricing
- Strong dry and wet weather traction and handling
Cons
- Subpar grip in snow and winter conditions
- Minor noise reported at specific mid-range speeds by some users
- Product line has been discontinued by Yokohama, making replacements harder to find
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Optimo H725 | B · Yokohama AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 700 A B | 560 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
55
/ 100
Hankook Optimo H725
65
/ 100
Yokohama AVID ENVigor
Winner: Yokohama AVID ENVigor — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama AVID ENVigor scores 62 vs 46 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama AVID ENVigor scores 67 vs 53 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama AVID ENVigor scores 69 vs 57 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama AVID ENVigor scores 64 vs 54 on comfort.
Tire A · Hankook Optimo H725
Tire B · Yokohama AVID ENVigor
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Optimo H725 or AVID ENVigor?
Which is better in the wet, Optimo H725 or AVID ENVigor?
Yokohama AVID ENVigor, 69 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Optimo H725 or AVID ENVigor?
Yokohama AVID ENVigor, 67 vs 53 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Optimo H725 or AVID ENVigor?
Yokohama AVID ENVigor, 58 vs 55 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Optimo H725 or AVID ENVigor?
Yokohama AVID ENVigor, 66 vs 61 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Optimo H725 or AVID ENVigor?
Yokohama AVID ENVigor, 64 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Optimo H725 or AVID ENVigor?
Yokohama AVID ENVigor, 63 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology