tirewheelguide

Hankook Optimo H725 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Optimo H725 vs Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 36 + 16 owner reviews. How we score

Geolandar X-CV G057 is ahead, 68–55

Check price on Amazon · Geolandar X-CV G057 or Optimo H725 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Optimo H725
Tire AHankook

Optimo H725

All-Season tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 36 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 53

    Dry

    Geolandar X-CV G057 +20
    73
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H725Geolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online4575

    Optimo H725: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 57

    Wet

    Geolandar X-CV G057 +17
    74
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H725Geolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online5276

    Optimo H725: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 57

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 73.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.6 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 55

    Snow

    Optimo H725 +6
    49
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H725Geolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online4635

    Optimo H725: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 58.3 (est.) + 40% × 35 = 49

    No road tests of snow for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 54

    Comfort

    Geolandar X-CV G057 +17
    71
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H725Geolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online4072

    Optimo H725: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 54

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for Optimo H725 or Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 61

    Noise

    Geolandar X-CV G057 +8
    69
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H725Geolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5272

    Optimo H725: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Optimo H725 or Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 56

    Treadwear

    Geolandar X-CV G057 +9
    65
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H725Geolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4965

    Optimo H725: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 46

    Handling (owners)

    Geolandar X-CV G057 +28
    74
    Why this score
    SourceOptimo H725Geolandar X-CV G057
    Reviews found online4674
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Optimo H725Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057
Relative Score 55 68
Dry 53 73
Wet 57 74
Snow 55 49
Comfort 54 71
Noise 61 69
Treadwear 56 65
Handling (owners) 46 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Optimo H725

Geolandar X-CV G057

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Optimo H725

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Geolandar X-CV G057

Pros

  • Exceptional wet grip and road confidence in rainy conditions
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Crisp handling and responsive steering performance

Cons

  • Some users report faster-than-expected tread wear
  • Firm ride quality noted on certain crossover fitments
All owner themes in the Geolandar X-CV G057 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Optimo H725 B · Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057
CategoryAll-Season tireAll-Season Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—64
Rim diameters—17″ – 22″
Tread depth9/32″11/32″
UTQG700 A B520 A A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Optimo H725

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057

Winner: Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Hankook Optimo H725 if snow matters most to you. Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 scores 74 vs 46 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 scores 73 vs 53 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 scores 74 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 scores 71 vs 54 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook Optimo H725
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Optimo H725 or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Which is better in the wet, Optimo H725 or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057, 74 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Optimo H725 or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057, 73 vs 53 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Optimo H725 or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Hankook Optimo H725, 55 vs 49 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Optimo H725 or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057, 69 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Optimo H725 or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057, 71 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Optimo H725 or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057, 65 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology