Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 vs Kumho Ecsta V720 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 2 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus RS3 Z222 is ahead, 67–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta V720
Tire BKumho

Ecsta V720

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    Ventus RS3 Z222 +1
    71
    Why this score
    SourceVentus RS3 Z222Ecsta V720
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests67≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7973

    Ventus RS3 Z222: 60% × 67 + 40% × 79 = 72

    Ecsta V720: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 71

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta V720. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 60

    Wet

    Ventus RS3 Z222 +2
    58
    Why this score
    SourceVentus RS3 Z222Ecsta V720
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests52≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online7254

    Ventus RS3 Z222: 60% × 51.9 + 40% × 71.8 = 60

    Ecsta V720: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 54 = 58

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta V720. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 67

    Comfort

    Ventus RS3 Z222 +10
    57
    Why this score
    SourceVentus RS3 Z222Ecsta V720
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6545

    Ventus RS3 Z222: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 67

    Ecsta V720: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 45 = 57

    No road tests of comfort for Ventus RS3 Z222 or Ecsta V720. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 67

    Treadwear

    Ventus RS3 Z222 +15
    52
    Why this score
    SourceVentus RS3 Z222Ecsta V720
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online6842

    Ventus RS3 Z222: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 67

    Ecsta V720: 60% × 58.5 (est.) + 40% × 42.4 = 52

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus RS3 Z222. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta V720. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  5. 77

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus RS3 Z222 +4
    73
    Why this score
    SourceVentus RS3 Z222Ecsta V720
    Reviews found online7773
Scores at a glance
Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 vs Kumho Ecsta V720: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Ventus RS3 Z222Kumho Ecsta V720
Relative Score 67 62
Dry 72 71
Wet 60 58
Comfort 67 57
Treadwear 67 52
Handling (owners) 77 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ventus RS3 Z222

Ecsta V720

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ventus RS3 Z222

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip with minimal warm-up time required
  • Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
  • Superior wet weather performance compared to typical semi-slick tires

Cons

  • Limited suitability for snow or freezing conditions
  • Performance is highly dependent on achieving optimal operating temperature
  • Stiff sidewall construction may impact ride comfort for some users
All owner themes in the Ventus RS3 Z222 review

Tire B Ecsta V720

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and traction for high-horsepower vehicles
  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Precise steering feedback and firm sidewall construction

Cons

  • High levels of road noise
  • Rapid tread wear
  • Inconsistent wet weather performance, with some reports of hydroplaning
All owner themes in the Ecsta V720 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 B · Kumho Ecsta V720
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222

Kumho Ecsta V720

Winner: Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 — better treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 2 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Kumho Ecsta V720 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 scores 67 vs 52 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 scores 67 vs 57 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta V720

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ventus RS3 Z222 or Ecsta V720?

Which is better in the wet, Ventus RS3 Z222 or Ecsta V720?

Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 58 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus RS3 Z222 or Ecsta V720?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Ventus RS3 Z222 or Ecsta V720?

Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222, 67 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ventus RS3 Z222 or Ecsta V720?

Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222, 67 vs 52 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology