Tests 59 · 1 test Owners 73 · 2 reviews
Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V105S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 2 + 425 owner reviews. How we score
Advan Sport V105S leads, 71–67 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 425 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
Level72Why this score
Source Ventus RS3 Z222 Advan Sport V105S Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 67 ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 79 75 Ventus RS3 Z222: 60% × 67 + 40% × 79 = 72
Advan Sport V105S: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.6 = 72
No road tests of dry for Advan Sport V105S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
60
Wet
Advan Sport V105S +1575Why this score
Source Ventus RS3 Z222 Advan Sport V105S Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 52 ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 72 76 Ventus RS3 Z222: 60% × 51.9 + 40% × 71.8 = 60
Advan Sport V105S: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.3 = 75
No road tests of wet for Advan Sport V105S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
67
Comfort
Advan Sport V105S +168Why this score
Source Ventus RS3 Z222 Advan Sport V105S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 65 67 Ventus RS3 Z222: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 67
Advan Sport V105S: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Ventus RS3 Z222 or Advan Sport V105S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
Ventus RS3 Z222 +265Why this score
Source Ventus RS3 Z222 Advan Sport V105S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 68 65 Ventus RS3 Z222: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 67
Advan Sport V105S: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus RS3 Z222. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Advan Sport V105S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
77
Handling (owners)
Ventus RS3 Z222 +572Why this score
Source Ventus RS3 Z222 Advan Sport V105S Reviews found online 77 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 | Yokohama Advan Sport V105S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 71 |
| Dry | 72 | 72 |
| Wet | 60 | 75 |
| Comfort | 67 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ventus RS3 Z222
Advan Sport V105S
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ventus RS3 Z222
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip with minimal warm-up time required
- Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
- Superior wet weather performance compared to typical semi-slick tires
Cons
- Limited suitability for snow or freezing conditions
- Performance is highly dependent on achieving optimal operating temperature
- Stiff sidewall construction may impact ride comfort for some users
Tire B Advan Sport V105S
Pros
- Outstanding dry grip and cornering stability
- Exceptional wet weather performance and resistance to aquaplaning
- Stiff sidewalls providing sharp steering response and direct feedback
Cons
- Shorter tread life or faster-than-average wear noted by some users
- Stiffer sidewall results in a firmer, less plush ride quality
- Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on vehicle and road surface
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 | B · Yokohama Advan Sport V105S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222
Yokohama Advan Sport V105S
Narrow edge: Yokohama Advan Sport V105S — better wet. Where the Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 2 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama Advan Sport V105S scores 75 vs 60 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ventus RS3 Z222 or Advan Sport V105S?
Which is better in the wet, Ventus RS3 Z222 or Advan Sport V105S?
Yokohama Advan Sport V105S, 75 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus RS3 Z222 or Advan Sport V105S?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 72 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Ventus RS3 Z222 or Advan Sport V105S?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Ventus RS3 Z222 or Advan Sport V105S?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology