Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V105S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 2 + 425 owner reviews. How we score

Advan Sport V105S leads, 71–67 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    Level
    72
    Why this score
    SourceVentus RS3 Z222Advan Sport V105S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests67≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7975

    Ventus RS3 Z222: 60% × 67 + 40% × 79 = 72

    Advan Sport V105S: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.6 = 72

    No road tests of dry for Advan Sport V105S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 60

    Wet

    Advan Sport V105S +15
    75
    Why this score
    SourceVentus RS3 Z222Advan Sport V105S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests52≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7276

    Ventus RS3 Z222: 60% × 51.9 + 40% × 71.8 = 60

    Advan Sport V105S: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.3 = 75

    No road tests of wet for Advan Sport V105S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 67

    Comfort

    Advan Sport V105S +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceVentus RS3 Z222Advan Sport V105S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6567

    Ventus RS3 Z222: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 67

    Advan Sport V105S: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Ventus RS3 Z222 or Advan Sport V105S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 67

    Treadwear

    Ventus RS3 Z222 +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourceVentus RS3 Z222Advan Sport V105S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6865

    Ventus RS3 Z222: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 67

    Advan Sport V105S: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus RS3 Z222. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan Sport V105S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  5. 77

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus RS3 Z222 +5
    72
    Why this score
    SourceVentus RS3 Z222Advan Sport V105S
    Reviews found online7772
Scores at a glance
Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V105S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Ventus RS3 Z222Yokohama Advan Sport V105S
Relative Score 67 71
Dry 72 72
Wet 60 75
Comfort 67 68
Treadwear 67 65
Handling (owners) 77 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ventus RS3 Z222

Advan Sport V105S

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ventus RS3 Z222

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip with minimal warm-up time required
  • Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
  • Superior wet weather performance compared to typical semi-slick tires

Cons

  • Limited suitability for snow or freezing conditions
  • Performance is highly dependent on achieving optimal operating temperature
  • Stiff sidewall construction may impact ride comfort for some users
All owner themes in the Ventus RS3 Z222 review

Tire B Advan Sport V105S

Pros

  • Outstanding dry grip and cornering stability
  • Exceptional wet weather performance and resistance to aquaplaning
  • Stiff sidewalls providing sharp steering response and direct feedback

Cons

  • Shorter tread life or faster-than-average wear noted by some users
  • Stiffer sidewall results in a firmer, less plush ride quality
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the Advan Sport V105S review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 B · Yokohama Advan Sport V105S
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222

Yokohama Advan Sport V105S

Narrow edge: Yokohama Advan Sport V105S — better wet. Where the Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 2 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Advan Sport V105S scores 75 vs 60 on wet.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport V105S

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ventus RS3 Z222 or Advan Sport V105S?

Which is better in the wet, Ventus RS3 Z222 or Advan Sport V105S?

Yokohama Advan Sport V105S, 75 vs 60 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus RS3 Z222 or Advan Sport V105S?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 72 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Ventus RS3 Z222 or Advan Sport V105S?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Ventus RS3 Z222 or Advan Sport V105S?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology