Tests 79 · 11 tests Owners 67 · 2,129 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 11 + 0 road tests and 2,129 + 16 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus S1 evo2 is ahead, 72–61
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 79 · 11 tests Owners 67 · 2,129 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)
Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 16 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 | ContiSportContact 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / – tests | 77 | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 70 | 59 |
Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 70 = 74
ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 62
No road tests of dry for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 | ContiSportContact 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / – tests | 83 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 62 |
Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 83.3 + 40% × 73.4 = 79
ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
No road tests of wet for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 | ContiSportContact 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 55 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 30 |
ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 55.5 (est.) + 40% × 29.8 = 45
No road tests of snow for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 | ContiSportContact 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 72 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 52 |
Ventus S1 evo2: 40% × 71.7 + 60% × 62.8 = 66
ContiSportContact 3: 40% × 65.9 (est.) + 60% × 51.8 = 57
No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 | ContiSportContact 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests | 76 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | 51 |
Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 75.9 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 72
ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 60
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus S1 evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
No road tests of noise for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 | ContiSportContact 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 63 (est.) | ≈ 60 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 57 | 50 |
Ventus S1 evo2: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.2 = 61
ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 49.7 = 56
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 evo2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 | ContiSportContact 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 68 | – |
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 | ContiSportContact 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests | 72 | – |
| Category | Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 | Continental ContiSportContact 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 61 |
| Dry | 74 | 62 |
| Wet | 79 | 64 |
| Snow | – | 45 |
| Comfort | 66 | 57 |
| Noise | 72 | 60 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 56 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | – |
| Efficiency | 72 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ventus S1 evo2
ContiSportContact 3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 | B · Continental ContiSportContact 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 61 | 22 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 16″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 280 A - B A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 14 | 14 |
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
Continental ContiSportContact 3
Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 — better wet, dry and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiSportContact 3 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 scores 79 vs 64 on wet.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 scores 74 vs 62 on dry.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 scores 72 vs 60 on noise.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 scores 66 vs 57 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2, 79 vs 64 on our wet score.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2, 74 vs 62 on our dry score.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2, 72 vs 60 on our noise score.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2, 66 vs 57 on our comfort score.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2, 61 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology